[Sugar-devel] Frequent buildbot check failures in sugar-web

[Code Raguet]

Hello, list!
quick-master is failing in almost every build since last Sunday (Dec 8).
I'd like to fix this and get back to green.

I'm not able to replay this failure locally, has anyone a failing local env?

full-master has been running successfully (3 times) since quick-master is
broken, so, I wonder:

- might this issue be a quick-master specific environment issue?
  - perhaps a dirty build artifact or remains?
  - is possible to force an "$ ./osbuild clean" on quick-master?


Another approach:
quick-master is failing within sugar-web module, the test that reports
failure is not new and suga-web hasn't changed since quick-master started
to fail, therefore:

- have been changes in  sugar-web/python contract? (this is a possibility,
but it feels like an envirinmental issue, IMHO)

Thoughts?

Help is very welcome.
Thanks!


On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks!
>
>
> On 6 December 2013 18:15, Code Raguet <iraguet at activitycentral.com> wrote:
>
>> Daniel, I've sent a tiny patch for osbuild.
>> Can you review it, please?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Code Raguet <iraguet at activitycentral.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, I'll sniff around that and I'll try to send a patch.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Unfortunately I don't think there is a way at the moment. But you are
>>>> making a very good point here, should be trivial to print out the commit in
>>>> osbuild pull, so that it's available in the log... I'll see if I can get at
>>>> it or patches welcome of course... Should probably go in _pull_module
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/dnarvaez/osbuild/blob/master/osbuild/build.py
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, 3 December 2013, Code Raguet wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> yesterday, before Gonzalo has fixed buildbot, I wanted to help with
>>>>> this and I was willing to run a "git bisect". Some submodule HEADs were
>>>>> broken and I needed a revision (commit SHA) of those where a build had been
>>>>> succesful.
>>>>> Looking at quick-master builder I found that build #23 was the last
>>>>> succesful build, but I couldn't figure out the submodule revision numbers
>>>>> that had been used in build #23.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not an expert with buildbot.
>>>>> How can I find out which submodule revisions have been used in a
>>>>> specific build?
>>>>>
>>>>> If there was a change, buildbot says the revision but not for those
>>>>> modules that didn't change.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Did you see the without-configuration issue in buildbot or locally?
>>>>>> If locally could you please post logs if you are able to repro?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (Thanks for pointing out the other failure, will post another email)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Monday, 2 December 2013, Rogelio Mita wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sometimes when check command is running, it calls karma without
>>>>>>> configuration file then fails, any idea why?.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyway, right now full-master fails before run "sugar-web checker"
>>>>>>> by two test on sugar-toolkit-gtk3: test_dist_source_out_of_source and
>>>>>>> test_dist_xo_out_of_source
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2013/11/28 Rogelio Mita <rogeliomita at activitycentral.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I will take note of this
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2013/11/28 Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/quick-sucrose-0.100/builds/6/steps/shell_2/logs/modules
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We are getting a lot of these, like 50% of the times.
>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately my laptop broke so I won't be able to debug them until it
>>>>>>>>> comes back repaired. Help sorting this out would be appreciated, especially
>>>>>>>>> if you are able to reproduce the issue locally.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Daniel Narvaez
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Roger
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Activity Central <http://activitycentral.com/>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Roger
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Activity Central <http://activitycentral.com/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Daniel Narvaez
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>>>>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Narvaez
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Narvaez
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131210/70ae0607/attachment.html>