[Sugar-devel] [PATCH sugar 01/20] Move the sugar-session code inside jarabe

James Cameron quozl at laptop.org
Mon Dec 10 17:00:01 EST 2012


No, I do not recall sorry.

Thanks, I acknowledge you aren't measuring yet.

There is a potential for startup performance impact with these
changes.  There is a risk of regression.

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:39:46PM +0100, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Do you remember what/how it was measured maybe?
> 
> Even if there are not idles we are constructing the home as very first
> thing and then after window manager loading we are doing all the rest.
> I suspect in theory that's all you can gain but... of course I could
> be proved wrong by measuring :)
> 
> On 10 December 2012 21:27, James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org> wrote:
> > Have you any Sugar startup time measurements to share; before and
> > after this patch set?
> >
> > I seem to recall the movement of startup processing into idle did have
> > positive effects at the time, but since then much has changed in the
> > underlying software stack, and so new tests are needed.
> >
> > --
> > James Cameron
> > http://quozl.linux.org.au/
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Daniel Narvaez

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list