[Sugar-devel] Clock #3394

Rafael Ortiz rafael at activitycentral.com
Mon Apr 9 15:27:56 EDT 2012


2012/4/9 Manuel Quiñones <manuq at laptop.org>

> El día 9 de abril de 2012 13:59, Gary Martin
> <garycmartin at googlemail.com> escribió:
> > Hi Manuel,
> >
> > On 9 Apr 2012, at 17:25, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Gary,
> >>
> >> have you found time to take a look at this issue? "Clock activity
> >> draws off the screen".  Rafael and I have some patches pending.
> >
> > When I last tested your patch I found it just drew a blank grey canvas
> on 11.3.1 and past releases of Sugar. I am not yet ready to start forking
> the activities I maintain for the GKT3 move (as I'm still not too happy
> with the use of dotted version numbers if I can avoid them – seriously
> thinking of ignoring dotted releases for now and just int +10 when I fork).
>
> Oh, good to know.  So I will test the patch in 11.3.1 and see what's
> happening.  Thanks!
>
> This is not for the GTK3 move, the issue appeared in olpc's builds for
> 12.1.0, in current Clock code.
>
> > I also don't have no tickets on http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/3394for a patches or two you emailed to the list (your patch for Cairo was at
> least one of them, might be one other). I know the core team use the
> patchwork website and email for landing things in sugar shell, but it seems
> pretty useless for activity developers to find/review patches. Any chance
> you could open some bugs.sl.org tickets for the patches you'd still like
> to see land?
>
> Right, I will open tickets for the Cairo port and the dragging hands
> feature.  However, I would like to see the fix for #3394 landed first,
> as it is a regression, I'm giving more priority to that.  And I don't
> mind to hold the Cairo port until I fix the text sizes.  Will open
> tickets to track them.
>
> >> Or may I request co-maintainership?
> >
> > Sure, however I'd rather get the above items sorted before you start to
> land patches and make releases, or I'm more likely to just hand it over and
> stop work on it myself ;)
>
> OK, we have to be careful while co-maintaining, pair reviewing or at
> least testing so we don't loose code quality, maybe Rafael can help me
> with Clock.
>
> +1.


> Thank you very much,
>
> > Regards,
> > --Gary
> >
> >> Greetings,
> >>
> >> --
> >> .. manuq ..
> >
>
>
>
> --
> .. manuq ..
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20120409/ac466e06/attachment.html>


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list