[Sugar-devel] #2399 UNSP: Record 79 (and 86) issues - Sugar 0.84-0.88

Rafael Ortiz rafael at activitycentral.com
Fri Jun 3 20:50:48 EDT 2011


Hi Art.

On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Art Hunkins <abhunkin at uncg.edu> wrote:

> @ Rafael expecially:
>
> With respect to various versions of Sugar and Record, I currently supply
> the following information in my readme.txt files for my FileMix and
> FileMixAuto activities (these activities suggest using Record to create
> audio files for use with FileMix):
>
> The natural vehicle for soundfile creation is the Record activity.
> This activity is fairly simple and straightforward; the only problem
> is that many versions of it do not work with various incarnations of
> Sugar. The following pairings of Record with Sugar seem to work
> reliably: v64 with Sugar-on-a-Stick Strawberry (0.84 - works rather
> poorly); and v86 with XO-1.5, and XO-1 upgraded to Sugar 0.84. Sugar
> 0.86 (Blueberry) and above (as of 5/2011) are compatible with Record
> v90/91, including XO's upgraded to at least Sugar 0.90 (Mango lassi -
> Fedora 14).
>
> ------
>
> The above pairings are the *only* ones that are compatible and produce Ogg
> Vorbis (not Speex) files.
>
> The problem is largely with SoaS Strawberry. Record v86, 90 or 91 are
> inoperative there. (FWIW, neither Record 90 nor 91 seem to work with the 2
> June current nightly Fedora SoaS build either.)
>
> This SoaS/audio Record compatibility issue is certainly a complicated one.
> For the moment, I rest my case, and only hope that eventually SoaS
> Strawberry will have a new Record that works well with it.
>
> Thanks for the precise information, this is also a problem of back
portability, as SOAS is a shorthanded project, I think that is preferred to
test activities on latest versions, I'm closing some of these  bugs as
obsolete for that reason, but with an open window (re-open state) if there
are people that can work on fix them.


 Cheers and thanks.

Art Hunkins
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sugar Labs Bugs" <
> bugtracker-noreply at sugarlabs.org>
> Cc: <bugs at lists.sugarlabs.org>
> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 12:33 PM
> Subject: Re: #2399 UNSP: Record 79 (and 86) issues - Sugar 0.84-0.88
>
>
>
> #2399: Record 79 (and 86) issues - Sugar 0.84-0.88
>
> ------------------------------------------+---------------------------------
>   Reporter:  abhunkin                   |          Owner:  dsd
>       Type:  defect                     |         Status:  closed
>   Priority:  Unspecified by Maintainer  |      Milestone:  Unspecified by
> Release Team
>  Component:  Record                     |        Version:  0.84.x
>   Severity:  Major                      |     Resolution:  obsolete
>   Keywords:                             |   Distribution:  Fedora
> Status_field:  Unconfirmed                |
>
> ------------------------------------------+---------------------------------
> Changes (by RafaelOrtiz):
>
>  * status:  new => closed
>  * resolution:  => obsolete
>
>
> Comment:
>
> I suggest re-testing with new versions (v91) of Record.
>
> --
> Ticket URL: <http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2399#comment:4>
> Sugar Labs <http://sugarlabs.org/>
> Sugar Labs bug tracking system
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20110603/dbf952fd/attachment.html>


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list