[Sugar-devel] #2295 UNSP: Sugar 0.88 [Dextrose] not reporting all favourite connections to NetworkManager at startup

Tomeu Vizoso tomeu at sugarlabs.org
Tue Sep 14 03:37:48 EDT 2010


On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 16:52, Franco Miceli <fmiceli at plan.ceibal.edu.uy> wrote:
> Effectively by debugging both Sugar and NM I found that ListConnections
> shows all of the favourite connections on connetions.cfg -Double checked
> within sugar and in NM- but then NM doesn't pass them to
> real_get_best_autoconnection.
>
> So It's NM's fault, and doesn't involve Sugar.
>
> I'll report this to NM list and open a ticket in their track.
>
> Thanks for all your efforts to try to narrow this down.

Nice work, good luck on the other side!

Regards,

Tomeu

> Cheers
>
> 2010/9/9 James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 10:26:40AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> > If anybody wants to reproduce James' tests, I would recommend
>> > redirecting dbus-monitor to a file and filtering afterwards the
>> > unwanted events.
>>
>> Yes, that's an alternate method, but it doesn't prove execution of code
>> in Sugar in response to events.  Instrumenting Sugar is fairly easy,
>> although it does require a restart.
>>
>> --
>> James Cameron
>> http://quozl.linux.org.au/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
>
> --
> Ing. Franco Miceli
> CITS - Plan Ceibal - Investigación & Desarrollo
> Av. Italia 6201 - Montevideo, Uruguay
> CP: 11500
> Tel: (598 2) 601 5773 int.: 2227
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list