[Sugar-devel] Activity & SoaS Licensing Concerns

[Sebastian Dziallas]

Hi folks,

I've lately taken the task of packaging more activities to get us a 
reasonably user experience for the next iteration of SoaS. The normal 
review process requires an application to be properly and clearly 
licensed. I'd like to encourage activity authors to work on getting 
these clarifications, if needed, committed into GIT.

For example, if your activity doesn't contain a license file that states 
unambiguously the licenses of the *whole* activity and all of its 
bundled libraries, a kind of per-file licensing would be good, as some 
files would be otherwise without a license specification.

I'm not trying to make things up here, but am rather just realistic, as 
such things are simply blockers. I'll try to follow up with people...

Thanks,
--Sebastian