[Sugar-devel] A heads up for the major changes that will appear in Fedora 15 / SoaS 5

Walter Bender walter.bender at gmail.com
Thu Dec 30 15:21:09 EST 2010

On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Bernie Innocenti <bernie at codewiz.org>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 09:27 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> >> AIUI, from discussions with Simon and Tomeu that's not the case. Gnome
> >> people are not that insane, the old APIs will still work and be
> >> supported.
> >>
> >> They won't be the latest coolest API wiz-bang so support may be
> >> weaker, and/or we may get "ah, well, the bug you mention is fixed in
> >> the introspection API, migrate to that" instead of a fix to the
> >> problem you report.
> >>
> >> Personally, I don't mind *not* being in the bleeding edge for one cycle
> :-)
> >
> > I agree with you. There's no hurry to switch to GNOME 3 and there are
> > higher priority tasks at this time.
> So are we saying that we don't want sugar on a stick for the F-15
> release cycle and are happy to have it dropped from the Fedora Spins
> and someone else is prepared do the work to get it back to that
> status? Or do people generally not care about SoaS?

I don't think that is what people are saying. I think they are saying that
we need not resolve all of our potential GNOME 3.0 issues immediately as the
2.0 libraries will still be present. Is that not the case?


> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20101230/cdd62575/attachment.html>

More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list