[Sugar-devel] Namespace for 0.84 updates to Browse and Chat?

[Tomeu Vizoso]

Hi,

sorry for the late reply, this is a very good question.

I think we should move to dotted version numbers for activities in
0.88, maybe interpreting a version number without a dot as 0.xx.

For now and for your specific use case, what about preppending
0.84/0.86 to the activity version number?

Regards,

Tomeu

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:10, Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I understand it, Sugarlabs wants to keep things simple for users by only
> using the equivalent of "major numbers" when versioning Activities.
>
> I am wondering, however, what version numbers can be expected for potential
> future bugfix releases of Browse and Chat targeted 0.84, as it seems to me
> that there have been left no natural numbers between latest 0.84-compatible
> releases and first 0.85-requiring releases.
>
> I ask because I would prefer to setup package tracking in Debian, and these
> two packages seems impossible to have a newer release by your chosen
> numbering scheme.
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>  - Jonas
>
> --
> * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
> * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
>
>  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJKuJSXAAoJECx8MUbBoAEhVWsP/RMpzkitqQMg2um/L2AUdAS8
> SiD1QMgMPoO9p43RsjRcgDMPVWN/P6zw2nJYFa9/GoD3thfR8frbad+ZRNiKllyi
> KgVV/MstsmOF9zR2drVRlwQXk0RDb/Uo1/Tug11cuLQCl5csvBQT2so9YZQ4zula
> 4Pbk4X6Oi8zNOVzdHZXzhcr2ilfEaFhsGL18ILBN732DVo43ZkCExFZFRy6dwprD
> q/o3iphNpBk5cnpxAJe6eaph7lY41sXLK12PCgMs1xjXHR+7n/3DfmLWsVT1vjIv
> 6PA+dU2V1LWMwYYgMo+/rpC89x1I306nV5lk2s1IdbaTPHgfVm+CREEWFBdWgM9H
> 0zXIuE0fngW6qBXoNzTegbwAQYtECqSSY66GdWxgZ/pJ+HIpPU+irreA1CmB6Ypz
> nBmc1Ed1L2sHZrXOwUEZQFOCp0TUezNMOprDww1dUTxj1cQUPCqY8/E08/t29w85
> KZeAPMrjvSkkeAUZ46xsJbjy2P+jenVaf0TjSDbZQtLJEvq4vLQ7YHUbkoHv/fnI
> HdkJotErMVt+Nv1Pc/kIWFZjZm9GFUqYKhfiyKQsc0cyDFLYTXSxltZDCoyX+gu4
> S8+sLTSstMqz3rS/6YWb3Wa3Xmk9AFAmoKV9oDY5U3yoQY98wXPmtKn7CCceIksw
> k5wKwL326UKA+GKEi+IV
> =AQmA
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>



-- 
«Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar.
What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David
Farning