[Sugar-devel] Rationale behind the JSON -> CJSON switch in Sugar codebase?

Tomeu Vizoso tomeu at sugarlabs.org
Thu Nov 19 09:11:05 EST 2009


2009/11/13 Sascha Silbe <sascha-ml-ui-sugar-devel at silbe.org>:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:12:11AM +0000, Daniel Drake wrote:
>
>>> As Tomeu mentions, Python 2.6 reduces the cjson/json performance advantage.
>>
>> OK, didn't see this. Yes, using python standard library seems like the
>> way to go.
>
> Unfortunately not all distros ship Python 2.6 yet, most notably Debian. So we need to at least fall back to simplejson for those.

Sounds good to me, so maybe we can ask for a minimum of 2.6 for 0.88?
How well that plays with Debian and its derivatives?

Regards,

Tomeu

> CU Sascha
>
> --
> http://sascha.silbe.org/
> http://www.infra-silbe.de/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJK/Uy7AAoJELpz82VMF3DaVrgH/3eITIQpsTw69cnj17uNtp3s
> H68eBr/0MNUig0SxbT5pHfHoWshykYr0xet/5O/SqmWfBrv43VG1pGee1bqHEDOq
> /+8lGF0WRjOYWMFhtld5g8TEhT9mnDzrdqYVi9NqXSEszF5qyovRI8h6IbxNiT3M
> rlKOUWPmFDroOOKloqoMh5Z1ChxltGECXeblSs7mX6S6CUf4awM4xuljMyfB4WLP
> 597Oeqz33F7iQqdVhnhUoAavf/hM7NV3LNRulD3uLDfDjHrCZejrel1YXV4ZFw3G
> dQhKs6MunV0YAhIhZbAA8PGZT58xgWDoYB1qWTBFtW5cGjYJmbiYP41JC1dwq1c=
> =8WBF
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>



-- 
«Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar.
What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David
Farning


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list