[Sugar-devel] Fwd: One week slip of Fedora 11 Release

David Farning dfarning at sugarlabs.org
Wed May 20 13:39:50 EDT 2009


Unless there is a good reason, I would say no.

Maintaining an upstream release date is an important planning tool for
all of Sugar Labs' downstream partners and users.

david

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Bernie Innocenti <bernie at codewiz.org> wrote:
> Shall we re-adjust our schedule accordingly?
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: One week slip of Fedora 11 Release
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 14:29:23 -0700
> From: Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com>
> Reply-To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Organization: Red Hat
> To: fedora-announce-list at redhat.com, fedora-devel-announce at redhat.com,
> fedora-test-list at redhat.com
>
> In a meeting today between Release Engineering, QA, and various team
> leads, we decided to enact a 7 day slip of the Fedora 11 release date.
> The primary reason behind this slip is the state of our blocker bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=F11Blocker&hide_resolved=1
>  We cannot begin Release Candidate phase until the blocker bugs are
> closed or at least in MODIFIED state.  We are not there today, which
> would be our last day to enter RC phase and still have enough time to
> release on the 26th.  We hope to enter RC phase in the next couple days,
> and hit our new target, June 2nd.
>
> Freeze breaks for critical bugs will still be accepted, however trivial
> bug fixes should be pushed as updates via bodhi.  Thanks!
>
> --
> Jesse Keating
> Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
> identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list