[Sugar-devel] Full Licence field

[Benj. Mako Hill]

<quote who="Simon Schampijer" date="Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 01:06:19PM +0100">
> we did show a full license in the Control Panel before. The path was  
> hard coded to where OLPC had placed the GPL license. What can we do to  
> meet the expectations of all the distributions that want to ship sugar?

It would be a great thing if we got the major distributions to agree on
a place to put common licenses. Debian puts them in
'/usr/share/common-licenses'.  I don't know where Red Hat puts them.

If we got agreement in those two places and on a list of common licenses
(even if one group just decides to symlink), we could get a majority of
distributions once the changes propogate.

Regards,
Mako

-- 
Benjamin Mako Hill
mako at atdot.cc
http://mako.cc/

Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far
as society is free to use the results. --GNU Manifesto
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20090301/5eb94e25/attachment.pgp