[Sugar-devel] amRe: [Cs-dev] Sugar on a Stick -andOLPCsound/Csound

Peter Robinson pbrobinson at gmail.com
Wed Jul 22 04:20:35 EDT 2009


Hi Art,

The csound-python should have gone out at the same time as the csound
as the former is just a sub package. Going forward they will be
updated simultaneously. Once we have the issue fixed I'll review the
package requires on various packages to ensure its always pulled in
where needed.

Peter

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 2:24 AM, Art Hunkins<abhunkin at uncg.edu> wrote:
> Hello, Peter,
>
> The new csound-python isn't out there yet, but I'll keep trying.
>
> I presume when all is tested and working, the updated Csound and
> csound-python should automatically be updated together. (Basically, whenever
> csound is updated, csound-python would update as well.)
>
> Am I correct?
>
> Art Hunkins
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Robinson" <pbrobinson at gmail.com>
> To: "Art Hunkins" <abhunkin at uncg.edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 5:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] amRe: [Cs-dev] Sugar on a Stick
> -andOLPCsound/Csound
>
>
>> Hi Art,
>>
>>> Interesting result - no doubt suggestive (from terminal output):
>>
>>> ---> Package csound-python.i586 0:5.10.1-7.fc11 set to be updated
>>>
>>> --> Processing Dependency: csound = 5.10.1-7.fc11 for package:
>>> csound-python-5.10.1-7.fc11.i586
>>>
>>> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
>>>
>>> csound-python-5.10.1-7.fc11.i586 from updates has depsolving problems
>>>
>>> --> Missing Dependency: csound = 5.10.1-7.fc11 is needed by package
>>> csound-python-5.10.1-7.fc11.i586 (updates)
>>>
>>> Error: Missing Dependency: csound = 5.10.1-7.fc11 is needed by package
>>> csound-python-5.10.1-7.fc11.i586 (updates)
>>
>> Not that interesting, it looks like an out of date mirror. The -7.fc11
>> as opposed -9.fc11 is just the build number. The later is the one that
>> has the compile fix in it. The former the previous build of csound.
>>
>>> Another observation (that I meant to mention before): I have no
>>> /usr/lib64 -
>>> just a /usr/lib. As you may know, there are two versions of Csound, a
>>> floats
>>> and a doubles. The doubles version is identified generally with the "64"
>>> suffix. I wonder if these two versions have gotten mixed up in
>>> distribution
>>> somehow? To my knowledge, only the float (32bit) version is part of
>>> OLPCsound (and SoaS).
>>
>> The /usr/lib64 is if your running the 64 bit of Fedora. I run that on
>> my main laptop. Its nothing to do with 2 different versions of csound
>> as the 32 and 64 bits of csound are built through the same build
>> system on Fedora so are build the same way and is of no consequence
>> here. I have multiple 32 and 64 bit machines.
>>
>>> Finally, I have none of the 4 files you list in my
>>> python2.6/site-packages
>>> folder (maybe because of the failed csound-python install?).
>>
>> Yes. That's because the csound-python package isn't installed. If you
>> try again (or a couple of times) you should get an up to date mirror
>> and hence the right build number.
>>
>> Peter
>
>


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list