[Sugar-devel] #370 HIGH: Can't open pdf after downloading from Browsev103 using Readv52

[Bryan Berry]

browse-101 loads the pdf w/in the Browse beautifully. Unfortunately
there is a caveat here and probably w/ Browse-103 on 0.84 

Browse stores the pdf in the Journal as org.pdf  for
http://www.orgmode.org/org.pdf

But for the following link it shows up as "eserv.php (application/pdf)"
in the Journal

http://www.pustakalaya.org/eserv.php?pid=Pustakalaya:195&dsID=Aba_Khel_Khelne.pdf&date=Mon,%2026%20May%202008%2011:51:17%20GMT

Many sites have query strings that link to pdf's. I presume that is what
Browse has trouble w/.

I tried 
http://www.pustakalaya.org/eserv.php?pid=Pustakalaya:195&dsID=Aba_Khel_Khelne.pdf  as well. Our Repository engine Fedora_Commons uses the appended date for document versioning. The pdf successfully loads in Browse but shows up as "eserv.php (application/pdf)" as well.



On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 14:50 +0530, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote:
> Bryan,
> You may want to download
> http://dev.laptop.org/raw-attachment/ticket/9112/Browse-101.xo
> It is for the 8.2.1 release, and has got support for showing PDF files
> within the browser using a plug-in.
> Thanks,
> Sayamindu
> 
> 
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Bryan Berry <bryan at olenepal.org> wrote:
> > Tomeu, tks
> >
> > We are working from OLPC's Staging 32 build which I believe roughly
> > corresponds to OLPC's 0.82.1 release
> > http://dev.laptop.org/~bert/staging/32
> >
> > Is Browse-99 the most up-to-date version that I can use?
> > http://dev.laptop.org/~bert/staging/32
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 09:03 +0000, SugarLabs Bugs wrote:
> >> #370: Can't open pdf after downloading from Browsev103 using Readv52
> >> -------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
> >>     Reporter:  BryanWB   |          Owner:  erikos
> >>         Type:  defect    |         Status:  new
> >>     Priority:  High      |      Milestone:  Unspecified by Release Team
> >>    Component:  Browse    |        Version:  Unspecified
> >>     Severity:  Critical  |     Resolution:
> >>     Keywords:            |   Distribution:  OLPC
> >> Status_field:  New       |
> >> -------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Comment(by tomeu):
> >>
> >>  Yeah, seems like those new Browse versions depend on Sugar 0.84. When we
> >>  move to addons.sl.o for good, every activity bundle will be marked with
> >>  the Sugar versions that it has been tested as working.
> >>
> > --
> > Bryan W. Berry
> > Technology Director
> > OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> >
> 
> 
> 
-- 
Bryan W. Berry
Technology Director
OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org