[Sugar-devel] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms

[Sascha Silbe]

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 03:14:24AM +0100, David Van Assche wrote:

[...]
> ok, that is about 50% of the failed testtube babies...
[...]

Thanks for your mail. I've been equally frustrated; even sugar-jhbuild 
on Ubuntu intrepid that was recommended to me didn't work (it might now, 
see recent thread regarding RPATH issues).
It's good to know I'm not the only one having so many problems with 
Sugar ("geteiltes Leid ist halbes Leid" ;) ). I'm much more motivated 
again.
The tables in the Sucrose section of the Supported Systems wiki page [1] 
have a "Tested" column suggesting that Sugar is tested _and_ _working_ 
on Debian, Fedora and Ubuntu (at least that's how I interpreted that 
column). IMO we should adjust that column to give a summary of how much 
of Sugar is actually working, with a link to a more detailed status 
page; for Starches as well.


[1] http://sugarlabs.org/go/Supported_systems

CU Sascha

-- 
http://sascha.silbe.org/
http://www.infra-silbe.de/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 481 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20090211/6de9e395/attachment.pgp