[sugar] Supporting desktop applications, extending the EWMH spec

Benjamin M. Schwartz bmschwar
Fri Sep 19 14:28:03 EDT 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
| On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
| <bmschwar at fas.harvard.edu> wrote:
|> Let's keep thinking about this.  For example, I wonder what Metacity does
|> to a window that is both  _NET_WM_STATE_FULLSCREEN and
|> _NET_WM_STATE_BELOW?  Does it stack it below the Frame, if the Frame is
|> _NET_WM_TYPE_DOCK and _NET_WM_STATE_ABOVE?  If not, could we convince the
|> Metacity developers that this is a good idea?
|
| I just thought of a worst problem with the FULLSCREEN approach.
| FULLSCREEN windows are always on the top of NORMAL windows.

Why is this a problem?  When do we need an Activity to be visible,
full-screen, and yet below a NORMAL window?

- --Ben
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkjT7zMACgkQUJT6e6HFtqRNUgCeIEI1prZOLgGWycAdRcGCefq4
LUgAn0jMC1yiHd2LkOAhZ/iPYwoJHyi6
=IHRK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list