[sugar] 9.1 Proposal: Persistent activity storage

Michael Stone michael
Mon Oct 20 15:35:00 EDT 2008


On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:25:40PM +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
> Am 20.10.2008 um 21:12 schrieb Michael Stone:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 01:36:06PM -0500, Yamandu Ploskonka wrote:
>>> It would be way nice it also came back to the same page, if you are
>>> reading a book
>>
>> Yes, that's also a goal, though it will certainly require activity- 
>> level
>> changes.
>
> Err - hasn't that been a requirement from the beginning? I thought that 
> any activity not storing its full state and thus not resuming to the 
> exact same state was violating the system rules.

Correct. 

Michael

(Perhaps you are suggesting that all current activity implementations
conform to this requirement?)



More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list