[sugar] RFC: activity bundles

Marco Pesenti Gritti mpg
Sat Sep 2 05:55:49 EDT 2006


Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>> Maybe id should actually be type_id to avoid confusion with the 
>> actual activity (unique per each instance).
>>
>
> Or we could leave this id in the bundle info and have something like 
> get_bundle_id in the activity api.

In the registry api itself we should probably use bundle rather than 
activity which is ambiguous.

Marco


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list