[sugar] Squeak / Etoys RPMs

[Ivan Krstić]

Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> Yeah, I don't think auto* is going to be a good base anyway and Ian's
> plan about setuptools made sense to me. Now, if Ian could work with Bert
> to port the etoys activity over setuptools, I think that would be a good
> basic test of his plan (the etoys activity looks really simple to
> "package").

Cool. Ian?

> That works for me. I'm going to need some C++ in the browser activity
> but I can just keep it as part of sugar rather than using a separate
> bundle.

Sounds good.

-- 
Ivan Krsti? <krstic at solarsail.hcs.harvard.edu> | GPG: 0x147C722D