[IAEP] deployment meeting agenda

[Holt]

18UTC does not work well given this collides exactly with the 2PM start 
of our "deployment" summit in the US Virgin Islands:

    http://realness.org/schedule/

Can we make it a few hours earlier?


Raul Gutierrez Segales wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 13:00 -0400, Anurag Goel wrote:
>   
>> May 28th sounds good. Are we set on a time yet?
>>     
>
> Would 18 UTC work?
>
>
> Raúl 
>
>
>
>   
>>  I would like to have a few of my team members present at the meeting
>> to share information/plans about our SoaS deployment in Delhi, India
>> this summer. 
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Anurag 
>>
>> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Raul Gutierrez Segales
>> <rgs at rieder.net.py> wrote:
>>         Tomeu,
>>         
>>         On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 18:46 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>         > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 18:37, Raul Gutierrez Segales
>>         <rgs at rieder.net.py> wrote:
>>         > > On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 11:38 -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
>>         > >> I made a first pass at a process on the team page:
>>         > >>
>>         > >>
>>         http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Deployment_Team#How_to_add_topics
>>         > >>
>>         > >
>>         > > So far we've got:
>>         > >
>>         > >     1. Migration to Sugar 0.88
>>         > >     2. Deployments Concerns
>>         > >     3. How to integrate better deployments and upstream
>>         work ?
>>         > >
>>         > >
>>         > > For a first meeting that might be good enough.. I guess
>>         people usually
>>         > > have 1-2 hours for such meetings. Something I've been
>>         wanting to discuss
>>         > > with Deployment for a while is good practices with School
>>         Servers
>>         > > management. Martin and Daniel have been discussing this
>>         recently in
>>         > > server-devel.. but I'd like to know more about
>>         deployments.
>>         > >
>>         > > But maybe we are better off leaving for a 2nd meeting?
>>         >
>>         > My initial thinking was that the first meeting would be
>>         about the team
>>         > itself, so we set up the base for the actual work that will
>>         happen
>>         > onwards. Specifically, topics such as updating the mission
>>         statement,
>>         > the member list, checking the TODO list is updated, setting
>>         some goals
>>         > for the next months, discussing how to reach the deployments
>>         that
>>         > inevitably will be out of touch, etc.
>>         >
>>         
>>         
>>         Makes much more sense... If at least we can get most of the
>>         deployments
>>         into the meeting and we can start to build conscience of
>>         working
>>         together it would be a great start!
>>         
>>         > But as you said, meeting time is limited, so maybe we can do
>>         those on
>>         > the mailing list?
>>         >
>>         
>>         
>>         +1
>>         
>>         Cheers,
>>         Raúl
>>         
>>         
>>         
>>         > Thanks a lot for leading this effort, Raul!
>>         >
>>         > Regards,
>>         >
>>         > Tomeu
>>         >
>>         > > Raúl
>>         > >
>>         > >
>>         > >> -walter
>>         > >>
>>         > >> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Walter Bender
>>         <walter.bender at gmail.com> wrote:
>>         > >> > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Tomeu Vizoso
>>         <tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net> wrote:
>>         > >> >> Hi,
>>         > >> >>
>>         > >> >> how do we propose topics for the next meeting? The
>>         wiki is a bit
>>         > >> >> ambiguous on this:
>>         > >> >>
>>         > >> >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Deployment_Team/Meetings
>>         > >> >
>>         > >> > I'd suggest we do something along the lines of what we
>>         do for the
>>         > >> > oversight-board meetings: simply let people add topic
>>         suggestions to
>>         > >> > the wiki and have the team then decide which will be
>>         discussed at the
>>         > >> > meeting.
>>         > >> >
>>         > >> > -walter
>>         > >> >
>>         > >> >> Regards,
>>         > >> >>
>>         > >> >> Tomeu
>>         > >> >> _______________________________________________
>>         > >> >> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop
>>         project!)
>>         > >> >> IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>         > >> >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>         > >> >>
>>         > >> >
>>         > >> >
>>         > >> >
>>         > >> > --
>>         > >> > Walter Bender
>>         > >> > Sugar Labs
>>         > >> > http://www.sugarlabs.org
>>         > >> >
>>         > >>
>>         > >>
>>         > >>
>>         > >
>>         > >
>>         > >
>>         >
>>         
>>         
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>>         IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>         http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Anurag Goel
>>
>>     
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/attachments/20100520/a41ec41c/attachment-0001.htm