[IAEP] [support-gang] An Opportunity to bring vital content tothe Sugar/XO world - Needs technical help.

Tomeu Vizoso tomeu at sugarlabs.org
Wed Jul 22 10:15:27 EDT 2009


On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 16:08, Gary C Martin<gary at garycmartin.com> wrote:
> On 22 Jul 2009, at 10:59, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 14:46, Costello, Rob
>> R<Costello.Rob.R at edumail.vic.gov.au> wrote:
>>>
>>> if you need some one to look at a fla or decompile a swf and have a look
>>> at
>>> what the actionscript is doing i can probably help
>>>
>>> don't know anything much about gnash but have done lots of flash coding
>>
>> Would be really great if you could run the .swf in soas and debug the
>> .fla in order to know why it isn't advancing to the next level. Once
>> you get an explanation from the Flash side of things of why this
>> happen, I think the Gnash developers will be able to find a fix in
>> Gnash.
>
> Tomeu, for what it's worth I don't think this is anything todo with
> Flash/Gnash incompatibility. The current eatboom SWF (and FLA source) is
> simply not quite working (likely related to the quick change they made for
> it to run outside of the rest of their system). I've tried with a number of
> Adobe Flash player versions and plugins, including your current gnash rpms,
> and they all fail to progress in the same way.

But it's working here on Flash 10.0 r22 :/

Any idea about what can be going on?

Regards,

Tomeu

> After bin hexing the binary files to work out what version they were created
> with, you will need to have the Adobe Flash 9 IDE to debug this code – my
> last $$$ upgrade was for 7, so I can't help debug the current FLA from the
> git rep.
>
> Regards,
> --Gary
>
> P.S. Sorry if I'm repeating myself, there have been some off list emails and
> I'm loosing track of what I've reported to whom.
>
>


More information about the IAEP mailing list