[IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Sugarcamp - November 7th-12th 2009 ?

Tomeu Vizoso tomeu at sugarlabs.org
Thu Jul 2 05:51:32 EDT 2009


On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 17:38, David Farning<dfarning at sugarlabs.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:41 AM, Simon Schampijer<simon at schampijer.de> wrote:
>> On 07/01/2009 12:49 AM, David Farning wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Simon Schampijer<simon at schampijer.de>
>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 06/29/2009 10:09 PM, David Farning wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Simon Schampijer<simon at schampijer.de>
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the SFScon 2009 will be held in Bolzano [1]. As part of that the TIS[2]
>>>>>> would be willing host a Sugarcamp. The camp would be part of the free
>>>>>> software week [3], where a GNOME Hackfest will happen as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It fits quite well in our release cycle (0.88 planning/hacking) and
>>>>>> having the GNOME Hackfest next door would create nice synergies. We
>>>>>> would start on a weekend to have better chances on getting (students
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> people who have to work during the week) everyone a chance to attend.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How does that sound?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds good.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any one in mind to champion the event?
>>>>> Do you have a point of contact with event organizers so we can start
>>>>> working on the admin?
>>>
>>> I'll help. But based on LinuxTag you seem to have event organization
>>> pretty much figured out.
>>>
>>> david
>>
>> The Sugarcamp will be a different event than Linuxtag. Linuxtag was a show
>> where you have to setup gear and get promotion material together, the camp
>> is more planning what you want to discuss during those days.
>
> Having participated in SugarCamp Paris and some FudCons.  How do you
> feel about the participant led format of the event?

As long as we depend on individuals doing their work in an autonomous
way, that's the best format IMO.

The day we see it's not practical any more because we are too many
people, I would like to see our community gathering in smaller, more
local events instead of moving to big events in a very hierarchical
way.

Regards,

Tomeu

> FWIW, SugarCamp Paris was intentional in it's lack of pre-organization
> to break from the 'Sage on Stage' broadcasting to the unwashed masses
> nature of previous Sugar Labs meetings.
>
> Caroline and I have been working with http://www.aspirationtech.org/ ,
> one of the leaders in non-profit events.  They have been a great help
> is asses what we have been doing right and what we can improve in
> upcoming meetings.
>
>> That time we have local help from the freesoftwareweek people, that I guess
>> take care of the rooms etc. The actual work is then staying in contact with
>> them regarding our needs, setting up a wiki, getting in contact with the
>> GNOME organizers...
>>
>> I would like someone else to champion that (better two people so they can
>> discuss things) - as I want to focus on 0.86. Should not be too time
>> consuming, maybe a nice way to start contributing to the project.
>
> I'll start the admin stuff.
>
>> Thanks,
>>   Simon
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> David Farning
> Sugar Labs
> www.sugarlabs.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>


More information about the IAEP mailing list