[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Today deadline for proposing features for 0.96
walter.bender at gmail.com
Mon Nov 21 08:13:33 EST 2011
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Simon Schampijer <simon at schampijer.de> wrote:
> El 21/11/11 13:29, Walter Bender escribió:
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Simon Schampijer<simon at schampijer.de>
>>> just a quick reminder that today is the deadline for proposing Features
>>> the 0.96 development cycle .
>>> The currently proposed and accepted Features can be seen here .
>>>  http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.96/Roadmap
>>>  http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.96/Feature_List
>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> Maybe I have misunderstood the process or made a mistake along the
>> line, but I had many other features proposed for 0.96 than showed up
>> in your list [2 above].
> There is a difference between proposing a Feature (mainly creating the page)
>  and proposing it for the release cycle . I did create my list from
> skimming through the mails that had the '[FEATURE]' tag in it.
Could we please make the latter requirement (posting email with a
[FEATURE] tag more prominent? I still cannot find it in the
I'll post my proposals to the list. Thanks.
(Gonzalo: You have a few unacknowledged proposals as well.)
>>  http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Background_image_on_home_view
>>  http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multiple_home_views
>> and dusted off from the past:
>>  http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Write_to_journal_anytime
>> (this is the only one that made your list)
>>  http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Thumbs_View_in_Journal
>> How do I get these proposals considered?
> Wow, those are quite a few, the list will get long quickly. Of course I will
> not discourage someone from working on something and as long as a Feature
> follows the Policy  it is considered for the development cycle, but I am
> a bit skeptical if we can achieve all those features in the next cycle, for
> the following reasons:
> * besides writing the code a Feature might have impacts on the workflow and
> needs design discussions
> * the code has to be reviewed
> * we need to test it as well etc
> * we have the gtk3 work ahead of us
> So I would propose to talk a bit about what is doable in the development
> team meeting tomorrow. And if we find agreement that we maybe focus on some
> items. And yes, it is great to have a pool of items we can choose from,
> schedule wise we are still in that phase.
>  http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Policy#Propose_a_feature
>  http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Policy
More information about the Sugar-devel