[Sugar-devel] depending on introspection
lucian.branescu at gmail.com
Fri Jun 18 14:13:56 EDT 2010
The way I see it, activities can't really use PyGI until it's a sugar
dependency. The sooner it is available as a dependency on all relevant
platforms (debian being one of them), the sooner important things like
Browse can start using it.
So, how about making some packages for all relevant platforms? There
can be some PPAs for ubuntu and some repos for debian and whatever
other platforms we care about. This will be some work, but I'm sure
other projects are interested in this as well.
On 18 June 2010 18:59, Daniel Drake <dsd at laptop.org> wrote:
> On 18 June 2010 12:20, Sascha Silbe <sascha-ml-ui-sugar-devel at silbe.org>
>> No, they're my problem because I develop Sugar on Debian systems. Can you afford to leave me behind? Is it worth the advantage of being able to use introspection (or whatever other bleeding edge technology that requires modifying major system libraries instead of just installing additional ones) right now?
> Regardless of who or which, I don't think its right that the problems
> of a single developer or distribution should hold back the rest of the
> Sugar project, which is realistically much much larger than that.
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
More information about the Sugar-devel