[Sugar-devel] Changing bundle_id and version scheme for Etoys
bernie at codewiz.org
Thu Jul 29 03:43:14 EDT 2010
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 00:23 -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Bernie Innocenti <bernie at codewiz.org> wrote:
> > There's no reason to have both a filename and a dbus-like name for the
> > same thing. The former must already be unique on both distribution sites
> > and in the Activities directory.
> I claim we should be using the dbus-like name for "both distribution
> sites and in the Activities directory".
Then activity bundle files should be named like so?
And their installed counterparts would look like these, correct?
No version number, since we don't seem to allow parallel installation of
multiple instances of the very same activity, right?
If a developer takes over development of, say, org.laptop.Measure,
should the developer rename the bundle to org.codewiz.Measure or leave
it alone? In case of a rename, how do they ensure a smooth upgrade path?
Sorry to ask so many questions, but global uniqueness is a worthwhile
feature to have only if with well-defined semantics and a clear purpose.
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
More information about the Sugar-devel