[Sugar-devel] Activity & SoaS Licensing Concerns
sebastian at when.com
Wed Feb 10 17:45:31 EST 2010
I've lately taken the task of packaging more activities to get us a
reasonably user experience for the next iteration of SoaS. The normal
review process requires an application to be properly and clearly
licensed. I'd like to encourage activity authors to work on getting
these clarifications, if needed, committed into GIT.
For example, if your activity doesn't contain a license file that states
unambiguously the licenses of the *whole* activity and all of its
bundled libraries, a kind of per-file licensing would be good, as some
files would be otherwise without a license specification.
I'm not trying to make things up here, but am rather just realistic, as
such things are simply blockers. I'll try to follow up with people...
More information about the Sugar-devel