[Sugar-devel] Sugar Platform clarifications (was: Re: [Debian-olpc-devel] Missing deps for sucrose-0.86.)
alsroot at member.fsf.org
Sun Nov 29 12:50:59 EST 2009
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 05:37:44PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 03:02:15PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> >Once 0install support gets merged, Sugar Platform should be enhanced to
> >include build tools (autocrap, c(++) compiler, ...); in that case,
> >activity authors can also rely on the corresponding -dev(el) packages
> >(i.e. libraries, header files, etc.) to be installed as well.
> I have not followed the discussions on 0install, but it surprises me
> that this should be mandatory - I always considered 0install as
> comparable to a distribution.
afaik there is no plans to "switch" to 0install, in my mind its an
edition to existed scheme(but if we accept this feature we should
have 0install injector library in SP), so using 0install dependencies
we won't extend Sugar Platform too much
> I might loose interest in Sugar if 0install becomes integral part of
> core Sugar. But that's another discussion.
More information about the Sugar-devel