[Sugar-devel] [IAEP] FSF attitude to xo and sugar
bastienguerry at googlemail.com
Fri Aug 28 21:47:44 EDT 2009
Bill Kerr <billkerr at gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Bastien <bastienguerry at googlemail.com> wrote:
> After a discussion with the FSF, they agreed the picture was not really
> appropriate and that the text should clearly distinguish OLPC from Sugar.
> They will make an update - stay tuned.
> the picture is gone but the words are still there:
This is good.
> As a result, it is expected that the main effect of the OLPC project -- if
> it succeeds -- will be to turn millions of children into Microsoft
> dependents. That is a negative effect, to the point where the world would
> be better off if the OLPC project had never existed
> still over zealous, purist and FUD
The FSF proposition is a normative judgement. For me I concentrate on
fixing factual errors, not such judgements above, as I think it's just
More information about the Sugar-devel