[sugar] Which to translate: Gulcose82 or Gulcose
Mon Sep 22 11:13:02 EDT 2008
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<mpgritti at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Korakurider <korakurider at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> That sounds good to me.
>> More specifically, Calculate-24 recently announced was built from trunk.
>> It is sad to see translation in branch just skipped :-< (And I
>> can't commit to trunk - #8588)
>> Another example is pippy; it hasn't had even branch.
>> I am NOT calling them bad, I just think there is confusion here.
>> If you say about intention to stick with trunk for specific
>> activity BEFORE you build release, translator could manage to keep up
>> with it.
> I expect some activity authors will want to branch and some will not.
> If we branched and then released from master then clearly we screwed.
> If you can provide a list of modules which are in this situation we
> will get them fixed up (one way or another).
> For modules that doesn't have a sucrose-0.82 branch, I think pootle
> should just point to master for 0.82...
> Sayamindu, does that make sense to you?
Yeah, it does make sense. In fact that's what we do right now.
However, there can be git conflicts, so I would _highly recommend_
More information about the Sugar-devel