[sugar] Supporting desktop applications, extending the EWMH spec
Benjamin M. Schwartz
Fri Sep 19 14:28:03 EDT 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
| On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
| <bmschwar at fas.harvard.edu> wrote:
|> Let's keep thinking about this. For example, I wonder what Metacity does
|> to a window that is both _NET_WM_STATE_FULLSCREEN and
|> _NET_WM_STATE_BELOW? Does it stack it below the Frame, if the Frame is
|> _NET_WM_TYPE_DOCK and _NET_WM_STATE_ABOVE? If not, could we convince the
|> Metacity developers that this is a good idea?
| I just thought of a worst problem with the FULLSCREEN approach.
| FULLSCREEN windows are always on the top of NORMAL windows.
Why is this a problem? When do we need an Activity to be visible,
full-screen, and yet below a NORMAL window?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Sugar-devel