[sugar] Initial Security Patches
Tue Jul 31 17:39:29 EDT 2007
Our rough idea was to say unsigned activities can't talk to each
other. signed<->* and sugar<->* would still be allowed though. Should
be enough to stop the most flagrant issues, while still allowing
interesting uses of DBus.
On Jul 31, 2007, at 5:26 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>>> 2 Activities lose the ability to provide services, which might be
>>> useful for direct interaction between activities. Ex. Write activity
>>> getting an image from the Camera activity.
>> Noah has thought more about this issue than I have, since he has been
>> working to improve our the state of our messaging security. In the
>> time, however, while I begin to ponder it, is there any list of
>> inter-activity relationships that already exist at the present
>> time? Or
>> any discussion of proposed relationships?
> Well, it's mostly a theoretical concern. Right now we don't have any
> of such relationships. I just fear it might be a problem as the
> system matures...
> Sugar mailing list
> Sugar at lists.laptop.org
More information about the Sugar-devel