[sugar] RFC: activity bundles
Fri Sep 1 05:05:20 EDT 2006
Am 01.09.2006 um 02:36 schrieb Dan Williams:
> Comments welcome. Especially from you, Blizzard, since easily
> installable and transferable activities is your baby :)
You wrote: 'Each activity bundle must, in its root directory, contain
a file with the same name as the activity bundle, but ending in
".info" rather than ".activity"'.
IMHO a fixed name, like "activity.info" would be preferable.
We could then rename the bundle, try different versions etc. without
needing to touch the inside. Also it would be simpler to script:
grep default_type *.activity/activity.info
It's common practice as well, like JAR's manifest.mf or OS/X bundle's
- Bert -
More information about the Sugar-devel