<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2017-09-18 17:22 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:samsongoddy@gmail.com" target="_blank">samsongoddy@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div class="gmail-h5">On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:14 PM, James Cameron <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:quozl@laptop.org" target="_blank">quozl@laptop.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:56:01PM +0100, Samson Goddy wrote:<br> ><br> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Laura Vargas <[1]<a href="mailto:laura@somosazucar.org" target="_blank">laura@somosazucar.org</a>><br> > wrote:<br> ><br> > 2017-09-18 16:37 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy <[2]<a href="mailto:samsongoddy@gmail.com" target="_blank">samsongoddy@gmail.com</a>>:<br> ><br> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:04 PM, James Cameron <[3]<a href="mailto:quozl@laptop.org" target="_blank">quozl@laptop.org</a>><br> <span>> wrote:<br> ><br> > Two items.<br> ><br> > 1. members@ alias<br> ><br> > It is wrong to leave unchanged the sunjammer:/etc/aliases members@<br> > entry, thus listing only the old committee.<br> ><br> > Please update the alias to list the new committee.<br> ><br> > $ ssh sunjammer grep members /etc/aliases<br> > elections: members<br> </span>> members: samsongoddy, [4]<a href="mailto:laura@somosazucar.org" target="_blank">laura@somosazucar.org</a>, ignacio<br> <span>><br> > thanks for pointing that out. <br> ><br> > Samson,<br> ><br> > Can you get in charge of this action please?<br> ><br> > I believe i don't have access to sunjammer. <br> <br> </span>Correct. You are not in sunjammer /etc/group and nor is ignacio.<br> <br> Instead, you have to ask systems@ in a clear simple post with one<br> topic.<br> <br> A reminder that the committee is at the same time jointly and severally<br> responsible for these actions. While members of the committee can ask<br> other members to take an action, that does not absolve the committee<br> members from responsibility to follow up the action.<br> <span><br> > 2. candidates' submissions<br> ><br> > Adam Holt's submission was truncated, without public consultation<br> > with<br> > Adam and without asking Adam to edit.<br> ><br> ><br> ><br> > Adam was properly informed:<br> <br> </span>Thanks, I see now it was private mail.<br> <span><br> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------<br> > From: Laura Vargas <[5]<a href="mailto:laura@somosazucar.org" target="_blank">laura@somosazucar.org</a>><br> > Date: 2017-09-16 0:20 GMT-05:00<br> > Subject: Thank you for participating as a candidate<br> </span><span>> To: Adam Holt <[6]<a href="mailto:holt@laptop.org" target="_blank">holt@laptop.org</a>>, Adam Holt <[7]<a href="mailto:holt@unleashkids.org" target="_blank">holt@unleashkids.org</a>>,<br> > Adam Holt <[8]<a href="mailto:aholt888@gmail.com" target="_blank">aholt888@gmail.com</a>>, Adam Holt <[9]<a href="mailto:canoe.berry@yahoo.com" target="_blank">canoe.berry@yahoo.com</a>><br> > Cc: sugar labs <[10]<a href="mailto:members@sugarlabs.org" target="_blank">members@sugarlabs.org</a>><br> ><br> > Adam,<br> ><br> > Thank you for participating as a candidate. Please note there is a 1500<br> > character's limit for each candidate's entry at the wiki.<br> ><br> > Yes, but where did we discussed limiting characters? that is where my concern<br> > comes in. I never agreed or see any mail from you about addressing<br> > characters. <br> <br> </span>Samson, you haven't read the explanation.<br> <br> Open<br> <a href="https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Talk:Oversight_Board/2017-2019-candidates" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/<wbr>Talk:Oversight_Board/2017-2019<wbr>-candidates</a><br> and read it carefully, thanks. It explains how Laura made the<br> decision; she posted a message and there was passive implicit assent.<br></blockquote><div><br></div></div></div><div>I read it, like i said the committee did not approve anything limit. it was laura's idea and shouldn't be forced on any candidates. It wasn't a problems last election i don't see why it should now.</div><div><br></div><div>1500 character is not approve. Candidates who wishing to edit and express themselves should. </div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br><br></div><div>Samson,<br><br>The majority of candidates were able to express in the space limit set without complaining. <br><br>Many even added links to be able to express additional ideas/projects/experience/etc.<br><br><br></div><div>In my opinion it was a great idea to set this very reasonable characters limit because it increases chances of all candidates submission to be read. <br></div><div> <br></div>Anyhow, can I send the election report to community?<br><br><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div>Laura V.<br><font color="#ff00ff"><b> I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org</b></font></div><div><div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:12.8px"><font size="2"><span style="color:rgb(102,102,102);font-family:"helvetica neue",helvetica,arial,sans-serif"><br>“Solo la tecnología libre nos hará libres.” </span></font></div><div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:12.8px"><font size="2"><span style="color:rgb(102,102,102);font-family:"helvetica neue",helvetica,arial,sans-serif">~ L. Victoria</span></font><br><br></div><div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:12.8px">Happy Learning!<br>#LearningByDoing</div><div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:12.8px">#Projects4good</div><div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:12.8px">#IDesignATSugarLabs<br></div><div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:12.8px">#WeCanDoBetter</div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div> </div></div>