[Systems] Sugar Labs Oversight Board Election Candidates 2017-2019 - Stage III Closed
laura at somosazucar.org
Mon Sep 18 18:37:42 EDT 2017
2017-09-18 17:22 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy <samsongoddy at gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:14 PM, James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:56:01PM +0100, Samson Goddy wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Laura Vargas <
>> laura at somosazucar.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > 2017-09-18 16:37 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy <samsongoddy at gmail.com>:
>> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:04 PM, James Cameron <
>> quozl at laptop.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > Two items.
>> > 1. members@ alias
>> > It is wrong to leave unchanged the sunjammer:/etc/aliases
>> > entry, thus listing only the old committee.
>> > Please update the alias to list the new committee.
>> > $ ssh sunjammer grep members /etc/aliases
>> > elections: members
>> > members: samsongoddy, laura at somosazucar.org,
>> > thanks for pointing that out.
>> > Samson,
>> > Can you get in charge of this action please?
>> > I believe i don't have access to sunjammer.
>> Correct. You are not in sunjammer /etc/group and nor is ignacio.
>> Instead, you have to ask systems@ in a clear simple post with one
>> A reminder that the committee is at the same time jointly and severally
>> responsible for these actions. While members of the committee can ask
>> other members to take an action, that does not absolve the committee
>> members from responsibility to follow up the action.
>> > 2. candidates' submissions
>> > Adam Holt's submission was truncated, without public
>> > with
>> > Adam and without asking Adam to edit.
>> > Adam was properly informed:
>> Thanks, I see now it was private mail.
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: Laura Vargas <laura at somosazucar.org>
>> > Date: 2017-09-16 0:20 GMT-05:00
>> > Subject: Thank you for participating as a candidate
>> > To: Adam Holt <holt at laptop.org>, Adam Holt <
>> holt at unleashkids.org>,
>> > Adam Holt <aholt888 at gmail.com>, Adam Holt <
>> canoe.berry at yahoo.com>
>> > Cc: sugar labs <members at sugarlabs.org>
>> > Adam,
>> > Thank you for participating as a candidate. Please note there is a
>> > character's limit for each candidate's entry at the wiki.
>> > Yes, but where did we discussed limiting characters? that is where my
>> > comes in. I never agreed or see any mail from you about addressing
>> > characters.
>> Samson, you haven't read the explanation.
>> and read it carefully, thanks. It explains how Laura made the
>> decision; she posted a message and there was passive implicit assent.
> I read it, like i said the committee did not approve anything limit. it
> was laura's idea and shouldn't be forced on any candidates. It wasn't a
> problems last election i don't see why it should now.
> 1500 character is not approve. Candidates who wishing to edit and express
> themselves should.
The majority of candidates were able to express in the space limit set
Many even added links to be able to express additional
In my opinion it was a great idea to set this very reasonable characters
limit because it increases chances of all candidates submission to be read.
Anyhow, can I send the election report to community?
* I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org*
“Solo la tecnología libre nos hará libres.”
~ L. Victoria
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Systems