[Systems] Sugar Labs Oversight Board Election Candidates 2017-2019 - Stage III Closed
Samson Goddy
samsongoddy at gmail.com
Mon Sep 18 18:22:27 EDT 2017
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:14 PM, James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:56:01PM +0100, Samson Goddy wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Laura Vargas <[1]laura at somosazucar.org
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > 2017-09-18 16:37 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy <[2]samsongoddy at gmail.com>:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:04 PM, James Cameron <[3]
> quozl at laptop.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Two items.
> >
> > 1. members@ alias
> >
> > It is wrong to leave unchanged the sunjammer:/etc/aliases
> members@
> > entry, thus listing only the old committee.
> >
> > Please update the alias to list the new committee.
> >
> > $ ssh sunjammer grep members /etc/aliases
> > elections: members
> > members: samsongoddy, [4]laura at somosazucar.org,
> ignacio
> >
> > thanks for pointing that out.
> >
> > Samson,
> >
> > Can you get in charge of this action please?
> >
> > I believe i don't have access to sunjammer.
>
> Correct. You are not in sunjammer /etc/group and nor is ignacio.
>
> Instead, you have to ask systems@ in a clear simple post with one
> topic.
>
> A reminder that the committee is at the same time jointly and severally
> responsible for these actions. While members of the committee can ask
> other members to take an action, that does not absolve the committee
> members from responsibility to follow up the action.
>
> > 2. candidates' submissions
> >
> > Adam Holt's submission was truncated, without public
> consultation
> > with
> > Adam and without asking Adam to edit.
> >
> >
> >
> > Adam was properly informed:
>
> Thanks, I see now it was private mail.
>
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Laura Vargas <[5]laura at somosazucar.org>
> > Date: 2017-09-16 0:20 GMT-05:00
> > Subject: Thank you for participating as a candidate
> > To: Adam Holt <[6]holt at laptop.org>, Adam Holt <[7]
> holt at unleashkids.org>,
> > Adam Holt <[8]aholt888 at gmail.com>, Adam Holt <[9]
> canoe.berry at yahoo.com>
> > Cc: sugar labs <[10]members at sugarlabs.org>
> >
> > Adam,
> >
> > Thank you for participating as a candidate. Please note there is a
> 1500
> > character's limit for each candidate's entry at the wiki.
> >
> > Yes, but where did we discussed limiting characters? that is where my
> concern
> > comes in. I never agreed or see any mail from you about addressing
> > characters.
>
> Samson, you haven't read the explanation.
>
> Open
> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Talk:Oversight_Board/2017-2019-candidates
> and read it carefully, thanks. It explains how Laura made the
> decision; she posted a message and there was passive implicit assent.
>
I read it, like i said the committee did not approve anything limit. it was
laura's idea and shouldn't be forced on any candidates. It wasn't a
problems last election i don't see why it should now.
1500 character is not approve. Candidates who wishing to edit and express
themselves should.
>
> > Your entry had 2009 characters so it has been edited to comply the
> > elections requirement.
> >
> > This is not a requirement from the committee, maybe yours not not us. So
> this
> > line of statement is unrecognized.
>
> A failure to build consensus; this is a breach of trust within a
> committee, and the way forward is to;
>
> 1. meet or communicate,
>
> 2. make assent active and explicit, rather than passive or implicit.
>
> 3. number and publish the committee decisions.
>
> On point 2, making assent active, my advice to Ignacio, Ibiam, Hrishi
> and Pericherla is to speak up with your assent or dissent.
>
+1 here.
>
> Silence is not assent.
>
> > You will be able to re-edit your entry.
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------------------
> >
> > Samson,
> >
> > You replied to me in Adam's email. I assumed you had read it.
> >
> > I wanted you to give me a reason why it was enforced on, without
> agreeing.
>
> Samson, can you confirm you received the mail sent to Adam? I'm
> worried that the sunjammer alias is to your sugarlabs.org mail
> address, and perhaps it should be to your gmail.com address.
>
Any i still don't have access to my @sugarlabs.org mail, what went wrong,
is it because i don't use my access to sunjammer?
@james @samuel @sebastain @bernie please confirm, what should i do?
>
> --
> James Cameron
> http://quozl.netrek.org/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/systems/attachments/20170918/49839b17/attachment.html>
More information about the Systems
mailing list