[Systems] developer.sugarlabs.org update hook unresponsive

[Samuel Cantero]

I think it's done and working again.

Best,

On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Samuel Cantero <scanterog at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 11:41 PM, James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org> wrote:
>
>> Okay, thanks.  Where's the flask app?  What's the building bot?
>>
>
> The code in charge of managing the hook is in freedom and it is not using
> kafka anymore. Maybe I called it wrong. I just named it "building bot" but
> apparently it was more confusing.
>
> It looked to me that Kafka on freedom port 9092 was meant to make this
>> async anyway;
>>
>> https://github.com/sugarlabs-infra/help-rebuilder/blob/master/main.py
>
>
> It was replaced (I suppose by SamP). I can see it was using kafka before:
> https://github.com/sugarlabs-infra/developer-rebuilder/blob/master/main.py
>
> Anyway, I will replace it now by this https://gist.github.com/scanterog/
> 8639b74d1ba077f132675e9712465cf3
>
> Maybe not very elegant but it should do the job. I will replace
> image/container now and test it.
>
>
>>
>> But I don't know what triggers the message from Kafka.
>>
>> If there's still a sugar-buildbot instance from back in Daniel Narvaez
>> days, I think we aren't using it and it might be time to turn it off.
>>
>> http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/ is down.
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 11:18:34PM -0300, Samuel Cantero wrote:
>> > I've recently checked it and I see the following as error:
>> >
>> >   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/socket.py", line 307, in flush
>> >     self._sock.sendall(view[write_offset:write_offset+buffer_size])
>> > socket.error: [Errno 32] Broken pipe
>> >
>> > This is due the python process (flask app) has received SIGPIPE signal
>> which
>> > means in this case GitHub has closed the connection. I think GH timeout
>> is only
>> > 1 sec and our building bot is taking more time. We need to reply to GH
>> when the
>> > payload arrives and then continue processing in background (async
>> mode). We
>> > might replace flask by aiohttp. Using celery is too overkill for this.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> >
>> > On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 10:10 PM, James Cameron <[1]quozl at laptop.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     Two recent commits by Walter and I have not updated
>> >     [2]https://developer.sugarlabs.org/
>> >
>> >     Is it failing in some way?  Can we fix it?
>> >
>> >     --
>> >     James Cameron
>> >     [3]http://quozl.netrek.org/
>> >     _______________________________________________
>> >     Systems mailing list
>> >     [4]Systems at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> >     [5]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/systems
>> >
>> > References:
>> >
>> > [1] mailto:quozl at laptop.org
>> > [2] https://developer.sugarlabs.org/
>> > [3] http://quozl.netrek.org/
>> > [4] mailto:Systems at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> > [5] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/systems
>>
>> --
>> James Cameron
>> http://quozl.netrek.org/
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/systems/attachments/20171002/7a5322f6/attachment.html>