[Systems] Mailmain configuration

[Dave Crossland]

Hi

Does anyone on the systems list support my suggestion? :)

Cheers
Dave
On Apr 11, 2016 6:46 PM, "James Cameron" <quozl at laptop.org> wrote:

> Good learning opportunities.
>
> The Sugar community is already convinced on this particular point, so
> I don't think it will be practical to change.
>
> Please continue to teach yourself and others how to use reply-all.
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 05:55:20PM -0400, Dave Crossland wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > It seems weird to me that when I click reply, I only email the author of
> the
> > email I'm replying to, off list; and if I click reply-to-all, all the
> previous
> > authors in the thread are CC'd along with the list, and the primary
> recipient
> > is the immediately upstream author.
> >
> > Code developers on sugar-devel@ are having to read all this stuff
> because of
> > the current configuration of mailman.
> >
> > People often don't know how to reply-all, so their replies are going off
> list
> > with the current config.
> >
> > People don't know how to eliminate duplicate mails, and are pestered by
> > duplicate emails with the current config.
> >
> > On 11 April 2016 at 17:43, Samuel Cantero <[1]scanterog at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >     On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 5:35 PM, James Cameron <[2]quozl at laptop.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >         My vote is against.  Reply-to munging is a technical attempt to
> solve
> >         a social and training problem.
> >
> >     Agree. Mailman does not recommend to introduce or override the
> Reply-to
> >     header.
> >
> >         The underlying problems are;
> >
> >         - several mailing lists with slight overlap of interested
> members,
> >           (why are code developers on sugar-devel@ having to read all
> this
> >           stuff?)
> >
> >         - people often don't know how to reply-all,
> >
> >         - people don't know how to eliminate duplicate mails.
> >
> >         I'm an administrator of sugar-devel@
> >
> >         On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 05:09:48PM -0400, Dave Crossland wrote:
> >         >
> >         > Hi
> >         >
> >         > I'd like to suggest changing the SL lists so that by default
> replies
> >         go only
> >         > back to the list, and most of the lists only accept mail
> addressed
> >         solely to
> >         > them.
> >         >
> >         > Who has a mailman admin account?
> >         >
> >         > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >         > From: Bastien Guerry <[1][3]bzg at bzg.fr>
> >         > Date: 11 April 2016 at 10:09
> >         > Subject: Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Action needed on two issues
> >         > To: Dave Crossland <[2][4]dave at lab6.com>
> >         > Cc: Laura Vargas <[3][5]laura at somosazucar.org>, "[4][6]
> >         iaep at lists.sugarlabs.org" <[5]
> >         > [7]iaep at lists.sugarlabs.org>, Sugar-Labs <[6][8]
> >         sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>,
> >         > SLOBs <[7][9]slobs at lists.sugarlabs.org>
> >         >
> >         > Hi all,
> >         >
> >         > as much as I appreciate efforts to be completely transparent
> on those
> >         > issues, would you mind having the discussion on a single
> mailing
> >         list?
> >         >
> >         > Receiving those emails twice is a bit stressful.
> >         >
> >         > Thanks!
> >         >
> >         > And a big hugs to all paid or unpaid Sugar/OLPC *volunteers* <3
> >         >
> >         > --
> >         >  Bastien
> >         >
> >         > References:
> >         >
> >         > [1] mailto:[10]bzg at bzg.fr
> >         > [2] mailto:[11]dave at lab6.com
> >         > [3] mailto:[12]laura at somosazucar.org
> >         > [4] mailto:[13]iaep at lists.sugarlabs.org
> >         > [5] mailto:[14]iaep at lists.sugarlabs.org
> >         > [6] mailto:[15]sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> >         > [7] mailto:[16]slobs at lists.sugarlabs.org
> >
> >         > _______________________________________________
> >         > Systems mailing list
> >         > [17]Systems at lists.sugarlabs.org
> >         > [18]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/systems
> >
> >
> >         --
> >         James Cameron
> >         [19]http://quozl.netrek.org/
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         Systems mailing list
> >         [20]Systems at lists.sugarlabs.org
> >         [21]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/systems
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers
> > Dave
> >
> > References:
> >
> > [1] mailto:scanterog at gmail.com
> > [2] mailto:quozl at laptop.org
> > [3] mailto:bzg at bzg.fr
> > [4] mailto:dave at lab6.com
> > [5] mailto:laura at somosazucar.org
> > [6] mailto:iaep at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > [7] mailto:iaep at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > [8] mailto:sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > [9] mailto:slobs at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > [10] mailto:bzg at bzg.fr
> > [11] mailto:dave at lab6.com
> > [12] mailto:laura at somosazucar.org
> > [13] mailto:iaep at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > [14] mailto:iaep at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > [15] mailto:sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > [16] mailto:slobs at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > [17] mailto:Systems at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > [18] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/systems
> > [19] http://quozl.netrek.org/
> > [20] mailto:Systems at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > [21] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/systems
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Systems mailing list
> > Systems at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/systems
>
>
> --
> James Cameron
> http://quozl.netrek.org/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/systems/attachments/20160411/060e4e54/attachment.html>