[Systems] Freedom's root filesystem full
Bernie Innocenti
bernie at codewiz.org
Thu Oct 9 13:19:38 EDT 2014
On 10/09/2014 04:04 AM, Sam P. wrote:
> Hi Bernie,
>
> Sorry I took so long to get back to you!
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Bernie Innocenti <bernie at codewiz.org
> <mailto:bernie at codewiz.org>> wrote:
>
> On 09/29/2014 03:10 AM, Sam P. wrote:
> > Hi Bernie,
> >
> > On Sep 29, 2014 12:58 AM, "Bernie Innocenti" <bernie at codewiz.org <mailto:bernie at codewiz.org>
> > <mailto:bernie at codewiz.org <mailto:bernie at codewiz.org>>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello Sam,
> >>
> >> is the stuff in /var/lib/docker2 still needed? The root filesystem is
> >> almost full.
> >
> > No... I migrated all the stuff in the docker folder to a new partition
> > by using that as temp folder... You can delete it.
>
> I recursively deleted everything under /var/lib/docker2, but there was
> still an aufs mounted under /var/lib/docker2, and it looks like it was
> still in use by docker! I unmounted it
>
> Can you please check that everything still works as intended?
>
> In case I accidentally deleted something live, we should be able to
> recover it from our daily backup.
>
>
> It did get broken... but the data was stored separately so I just
> restarted the container
>
>
>
>
> >> Also, the two filesystems you mounted for docker instances are not in
> >> /etc/fstab. You might want to add them.
>
>
> Done!
>
>
> >
> > I will be away from my laptop for a while now, but I will do this ;)
>
> Ok.
>
> Another question: which docker package are we using on freedom? We seem
> to be using lxc-docker-1.2.0, but there were leftover config files from
> an older docker.io <http://docker.io> version 0.9.1. I purged them
> to avoid confusion.
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> >> One last question: do we specifically need btrfs for snapshots or some
> >> other feature? If not, I'd rather keep using ext4 exclusively on all
> >> servers to reduce the number of kernel bugs we hit.
> >
> > I will move back to ext4. The only reason I used btrfs was some
> > magazine article praising it as the filesystem of the future.
>
> I've been following btrfs development for some 7 years, but it's been a
> disappointment. It's not really... better. It's much slower than ext4
> for common workloads and it's just barely starting to become stable now.
> No distribution (other than Oracle's RHEL ripoff) made it the default,
> and RHEL7 just switched to xfs, showing that RH is not interested in
> btrfs.
>
> But btrfs has COW snapshots, which make it perfect for some
> applications. Have you seen Lennart Poettering's b new package
> management proposal?
>
>
> Cool, I see. I don't use any of the fancy stuff.
> This is really dumb, but is there a tool for moving stuff between
> partitions (other than copying)? Copying is messy :(
To copy a system along with all its metadata, I do:
rsync -PHAXphax --numeric-ids --delete /path/to/src/ /path/to/dst/
Note that the leading slashes are important, and that some of the
options are redundant, but help make the command more memorable :-)
--
_ // Bernie Innocenti
\X/ http://codewiz.org
More information about the Systems
mailing list