[Systems] [Sugar-devel] g.sl.o issues for Karma and perhaps other activities

[Bryan Berry]

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Bernie Innocenti <bernie at codewiz.org> wrote:

> Sorry it took some time to answer this thread. I'm still recovering from
> a new year's eve in Times Square :-)


np, hope you had a great time!


> The problem with managing many repositories by hand is not just setting
> them up.  Once you have plenty of people accessing these repositories,
> you'll need to implement fine-grained access control. The number of
> access requests probably grows very quickly, proportionally to the
> number of developers and repositories. Soon or later, your gitmaster
> will become buried in support requests.

That said, Gitorious is a complex Rails application. Compared to other
> web applications, it was quite hard to deploy and maintain. Indefero
> (http://www.indefe <http://www.indefero.net/>ro.net/<http://www.indefero.net/>)
> sounds like a much simpler alternative that I

would investigate.
>

I am wary of experimenting when the gslo infrastructure is still in flux. I
would rather stick w/ gitweb or cgit and then move to whatever becomes of
gslo. Should we start w/ cgit or gitweb?

I have my hands full experimenting w/ SVG and html5 at the moment so I need
to keep my focus there for the time being.

Finally, we've been planning to migrate to the Nokia instance of
> Gitorious for a while. We're currently waiting for management approval,
> for which I have no ETA. We'll ping them again after the holidays.
>
> Meanwhile, I would appreciate if someone would like to experiment with a
> fresher installation of Gitorious. Bryan, if you feel like working on
> it, I could create a gitorious account for you on Sunjammer.
>

Again, I would love to but my plate is quite full right now supporting roxan
and Vaibhaw's work on Karma.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.sugarlabs.org/private/systems/attachments/20100103/15cd043e/attachment.htm