[Systems] IPv6 connectivity for Sugar Labs foundation

James Jun james at towardex.com
Tue Sep 15 14:33:36 EDT 2009


Dan,

The IPv6 block for the transfer network vlan between FSF and TowardEX is
2001:4830:1FE::4/126.
TowardEX SIDE is 2001:4830:1fe::5, FSF SIDE is 2001:4830:1fe::6. 

I assume we want to do BGP routing over this circuit, just like we are doing
on IPv4?  Please advise.

Sorry for the delay, been catching up since vacation :)

James


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Jared Domínguez [mailto:danjared at MIT.EDU]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:50 PM
> To: James Jun
> Cc: 'Daniel Clark'; 'Bernie Innocenti'; pubservices at occaid.org; 'Sugar
> Labs Systems'; noc at occaid.org; dan at gnaps.com; 'Peter Olson'
> Subject: Re: IPv6 connectivity for Sugar Labs foundation
> 
> How is this coming along?
> 
> --Jared
> 
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 03:48:59PM -0400, James Jun wrote:
> > Yea, FSF is a sponsored (i.e. zero-dollar customer) account,
> originally
> > setup with Justin Baugh long time ago.  So, I just double checked and
> there
> > won't be any cost for us to enable v6 on this link.
> >
> > I'm on vacation today. When I get back next week I will get the IPv6
> > information for you and reply to this email thread.  Let me know if
> you guys
> > have any questions in the meantime.
> >
> > Regards,
> > James
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Daniel Clark [mailto:dclark at pobox.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 3:39 PM
> > > To: James Jun
> > > Cc: 'Daniel Jared Domínguez'; 'Bernie Innocenti';
> > > pubservices at occaid.org; 'Sugar Labs Systems'; noc at occaid.org;
> > > dan at gnaps.com; 'Peter Olson'
> > > Subject: Re: IPv6 connectivity for Sugar Labs foundation
> > >
> > > As long as there would be no cost impact on the FSF or GNAPS, and
> no
> > > impact to the FSF's IPv4 service, and GNAPS is fine with it, I
> don't
> > > see why the FSF (who hosts the Sugar Labs foundation server) would
> have
> > > any objection to that.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Daniel JB Clark   | Sys Admin, Free Software Foundation
> > > pobox.com/~dclark | http://www.fsf.org/about/staff#danny
> > >
> > >
> > > James Jun wrote:
> > > > Hi folks,
> > > >
> > > > We should be able to pump native v6 down the VLAN from Towardex
> > > > router, since FSF is a customer circuit.  Let me know if you want
> to
> > > > move forward with that I'll get the IMT info for v6 on that vlan.
> > > >
> > > > James
> > > >
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: Daniel Jared Domínguez [mailto:danjared at MIT.EDU]
> > > >> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 1:36 PM
> > > >> To: Daniel Clark
> > > >> Cc: Bernie Innocenti; James Jun; pubservices at occaid.org; 'Sugar
> Labs
> > > >> Systems'; noc at occaid.org; dan at gnaps.com; Peter Olson
> > > >> Subject: Re: IPv6 connectivity for Sugar Labs foundation
> > > >>
> > > >> Yes, we were able to get to 6to4 working, although that's
> certainly
> > > >> suboptimal for various reasons compared to native connectivity.
> > > >>
> > > >> I looked at the FSF core router, and it is running a recent
> enough
> > > >> version of quagga to do v6.
> > > >>
> > > >> The FSF's router has a virtual interface running an IPv4 BGP
> session
> > > >> with a TowardEX router (remote router ID is 216.93.255.131). I
> > > >> believe it to be doing this on VLAN 1575. I don't know if this
> can
> > > be
> > > >> reused for the v6 link. This physical interface is at least the
> one
> > > >> we'd probably be using since it is going to the MXP. Sorry that
> I
> > > >> don't have a circuit ID for you.
> > > >>
> > > >> --Jared
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:21:12AM -0400, Daniel Clark wrote:
> > > >>> Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> > > >>>> El Fri, 07-08-2009 a las 13:38 -0400, James Jun escribió:
> > > >>>>> OCCAID will be happy to assist.  Where do you need the v6
> service
> > > >>>>> delivered at, at FSF location or MIT?  If your v6 termination
> > > >>>>> equipment is hosted at FSF which is GNAPS facility in Quincy,
> ask
> > > >>>>> them to run a cross-connect for you to Boston MXP. We can
> then
> > > >>>>> shoot a vlan across MXP switch fabric from OCCAID POP in
> Boston/1
> > > >>>>> Summer Street and hand off v6 to you natively.
> > > >>>> I'm quite unfamiliar with the FSF network equipment at GNAPs,
> to
> > > >> the
> > > >>>> point that I haven't yet even seen the physical box which
> hosts
> > > the
> > > >>>> main Sugar Labs machine.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I've been talking with Dan Benson of GNAPs (on cc) to figure
> out
> > > >>>> what needs to be done.  Danny Clark and Dan Jared of the FSF
> are
> > > >>>> going to get in contact with him to get the BGP router
> connected.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks to everybody for being very helpful.
> > > >>> FYI danjared and bernie got tun6to4 working last night; we had
> just
> > > >>> missed the need to add a line to iptables on the FSF's BGP
> router,
> > > >>> ge-core1.qcy.gnu.org [1].
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I think they are still looking at OCCAID, which danjared, who
> seems
> > > >> to
> > > >>> have the most clue in this area, thinks is a much better long-
> term
> > > >> solution.
> > > >>> [1] /etc/default/iptables-rules change
> > > >>> --- iptables-rules.aug10.from-filesystem	2009-08-10
> > > >> 23:20:16.000000000 -0400
> > > >>> +++ iptables-rules	2009-08-10 23:21:18.000000000 -0400
> > > >>> @@ -28,6 +28,9 @@
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  -A input_block -p icmp -m icmp --icmp-type 8 -m limit --limit
> > > 5/sec
> > > >> -j
> > > >>> ACCEPT
> > > >>>
> > > >>> +# bernie and danjared (w/ dclark): allow incoming 6to4 packets
> -A
> > > >>> +input_block -p ipv6 -j ACCEPT
> > > >>> +
> > > >>>  # Blacklisted hosts
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  -A input_block -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 --src 216.220.57.41 -j
> > > DROP
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Cheers and thanks to everyone for the assistance,
> > > >>> --
> > > >>> Daniel JB Clark   | Sys Admin, Free Software Foundation
> > > >>> pobox.com/~dclark | http://www.fsf.org/about/staff#danny
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Daniel Jared Domínguez
> > > >> email/jabber: danjared at mit.edu
> > > >> pots phone: 617.368.0509
> > > >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Daniel Jared Domínguez
> email/jabber: danjared at mit.edu
> pots phone: 617.368.0509



More information about the Systems mailing list