[Systems] IPv6 for buildslave-fedora-11-64bit.sugarlabs.org

[Bernie Innocenti]

El Sat, 10-10-2009 a las 11:35 +0200, Sascha Silbe escribió:
> > Admittedly, the ipv6 situation on bender is quite tricky because it
> > interacts in complex ways with all those virtual bridges used by
> > libvirtd.
> What about Develer getting an IPv6 uplink (either native or via SixXS) 
> and delegating a subnet to bender? Would get rid of the 
> tunnel-packets-being-treated-as-VoIP as well.

Adding tun6to4 and radvd to Develer's main router would mean that _all_
the machines would get a globally routed IPv6 address.

I'm afraid Develer has become too risk-averse for trying this...
actually I'd be worried too without adding some good ip6tables rules for
the desktops.

For experimental purposes, I've already setup tun6to4 on one of their
servers, but that doesn't have a global impact.

> > Perhaps we'll reconsider when we've grow more confidence in KVM 
> > resource allocation and prioritization.
> Not likely to happen in the near future I'd guess. Especially with 
> JhBuildBot starting all builds in parallel [1].
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591231

Who cares what happens *inside* a VM? I was talking about allocating a
smaller CPU slice to the intire guest at the KVM level (and perhaps
limiting also disk I/O; memory already has a fixed upper bound).

-- 
   // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
 \X/  Sugar Labs       - http://sugarlabs.org/