[Systems] a.sl.o progress

[Daniel Clark]

Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Wed, 11-11-2009 a las 01:58 -0600, David Farning escribió:
>> 3. There is no direct interaction between the aslo cluster and
>> sunjammer.  Rather than setting up nfs between download.sl.o and
>> sunjammer, I am running rsync every ten minutes.  If sunjammer is
>> compromised it will not affect aslo.
> 
> Good idea, but how do we get it to work when we have, say, 3 aslo
> frontends running concurrently?
> 
> If files are never removed or renamed, it may be possible to setup rsync
> in both directions.

May also want to look at http://oss.linbit.com/csync2/ for this kind of
thing.

-- 
Daniel JB Clark   | Sys Admin, Free Software Foundation
pobox.com/~dclark | http://www.fsf.org/about/staff#danny