[Systems] cacheboy is looking for bandwidth in U.S.

[Adrian Chadd]

g'day,

indeed the cdn setup will handle node failures. I'll just have to be
conservative about bandwidth use until more US nodes are available.

Please let me know how to best move forward with this.

thanks,

adrian

2009/8/29 Bernie Innocenti <bernie at codewiz.org>:
> El Fri, 28-08-2009 a las 07:46 +0200, Marten Vijn escribió:
>> The Bandwidth is for CacheBoy. CacheBoy a global candidate to destribute
>> Sugar and other FLOSS.
>>
>> more info on http://cacheboy.net
>>
>> Adrian Chadd from cacheboy is willing to distribute Sugar via cacheboy.
>> IHMO that would be a large mutual benefit.
>>
>> Currently Bandwidth seems to be a problem in the U.S.
>>
>> De Node requirements:
>> http://cacheboy.net/node_requirements.html
>>
>> I think contacting the admins directly to Adrian would be the best
>> solution.
>
> >From a technical standpoint, it looks like we have enough capacity to
> setup a node on treehouse, the big KVM box we're setting up.
>
> I've asked the owner of treehouse if he's ok with this idea and the FSF
> admins if we can meet the bandwidth requirements without upsetting GNAPs
> too much.
>
> I'd like to stress in advance that the current hardware of treehouse is
> not to be considered solid enouh to guarantee near-100% uptime: there's
> no redundant PSU and the drives are not hot-swappable.  I'd expect the
> mirror system to be able to cope with node failures gracefully.
>
> --
>   // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
>  \X/  Sugar Labs       - http://sugarlabs.org/
>
>