<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hola a todos,<br>
Lo siento por retransmitir esto tan tardíamente.<br>
Votaron 55 de los 217 miembros de Sugar Labs. <br>
Para averiguar como ser miembro, ver en <a
href="http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members">http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members</a>
.<br>
El resultado es que la mayoría prefiere la licencia GPLv3.<br>
Por tanto la licencia que Sugar Labs sugiere para desarrollos de
Sugar es GPLv3 y se sugiere a los desarrolladores que actualicen sus
licencias.<br>
Obviamente no podemos obligar a nadie ;-)<br>
Abajo aparece el detalle de la matriz condorcet de voto. Entiendo
que 34 preferían la GPL3 contra 21 que preferían la GPLv2.<br>
<br>
Me alegro porque siento que Sugar es una comunidad que va más allá
de los desarrolladores y es bueno que se consulte este tipo de cosas
a todos.<br>
Saludos<br>
Sebastian<br>
<br>
-------- Mensaje original --------
<table class="moz-email-headers-table" border="0" cellpadding="0"
cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">Asunto: </th>
<td>[Marketing] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum
(non-binding) results</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">Fecha: </th>
<td>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:45:51 -0400</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">De: </th>
<td>Luke Faraone <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:luke@sugarlabs.org"><luke@sugarlabs.org></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">Organización:
</th>
<td>Sugar Labs</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">A: </th>
<td>IAEP SugarLabs <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org"><iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org></a>, Sugar
Devel <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org"><sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">CC: </th>
<td>SoaS <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:soas@lists.sugarlabs.org"><soas@lists.sugarlabs.org></a>, Marketing
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org"><marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org></a>, OLPC Devel
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:devel@laptop.org"><devel@laptop.org></a>, Community Support Volunteers
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:support-gang@lists.laptop.org"><support-gang@lists.laptop.org></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<br>
<pre>On 06/14/2011 05:42 PM, Luke Faraone wrote:
> This is a vote to determine the suggested license for future releases
> of Sugar. This poll will run from right now until Wed Jun 29 2011 at
> midnight UTC-4.
Sorry for the late update; the reporting mechanism for our voting
software temporarily broke.
Summary: the winner was **GNU GPL version 3, or any later version**.
## Results Details ##
55 out of 217 eligible members voted, or a little more than ¼.
The full results of this election ranked the candidates in order of
preference (from most preferred to least preferred):
1. GNU GPL version 3, or any later version
2. GNU GPL version 2, or any later version
3. Don't know or don't care
Each number in the table below shows how many times the candidate on the
left beat the matching candidate on the top. The winner is on the top of
the left column.
v3 v2 DC
v3 -- 34 37
v2 21 -- 42
DC 18 13 --
Based on a sheer count of 1st place votes, v3 received 49% of the vote,
v2 received 29% of the vote, and the apathetic position received the
remaining 22% of the vote.
Full details (and alternative election method calculations) are visible
at the Selectricity page linked in the original voting ticket email.
Thanks,
Luke Faraone
Sugar Labs, Systems
✉: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:luke@sugarlabs.org">luke@sugarlabs.org</a>
I: lfaraone on irc.freenode.net
</pre>
</body>
</html>