[sugar-sur] [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

I totally agree with "We should be able to speak about Sugar deployments as
we now speak about OLPC deployments. Sugar should be available for PCs and
mobile devices with xo being considered as one of the supported
environments".

I think we limited ourselves to an extent on OLPC deployments, we've tried
so far in making sugar available for different devices. Those companies are
not limited because canonical doesn't provide hardware devices neither does
redhat, but they've partnered with different companies that do.

Tony, if you've any plan as to expanding our reach apart from the one's
already listed, it'll be great if you tell us.

Best regards

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Tony Anderson <tony_anderson en usa.net> wrote:

> Hi, All
>
> I certainly appreciate the attention my email has received. However, I am
> disappointed that the responses do not reflect my main concern. I beleive
> Sugar and Sugar Labs will fade away if it continues to be perceived as the
> software that comes on an XO. I believe Sugar Labs and Sugar should be
> perceived as in a similar relationship as Red Hat is to Fedora and
> Canonical is to Ubuntu.
>
> We need to have releases of Sugar: Long-term-support, latest stable, and
> developer. These releases should be downloadable as a single image which
> can be installed from a livecd usb stick generated by a dd command. The
> starting point is probably SOAS - which is not now installable without a
> technically difficult use of livecd tools in a Fedora 24 installation
> (which is difficult since Fedora provides Fedora 25).
>
> As an evaluation of Sugar Lab's success is that the Mexican deployment
> presented in the OLPC SF Summit chooses to use Sugar instead of UberMix.
> (http://www.ubermix.org/).
>
> We should be able to speak about Sugar deployments as we now speak about
> OLPC deployments. Sugar should be available for PCs and mobile devices with
> xo being considered as one of the supported environments.
>
> If no action is taken except to discuss future academic papers about Sugar
> Labs and SLOB elections, I think both will become totally irrelevant.
> Current OLPC deployments will choose new hardware to replace XOs and
> install on this hardware Windows, Raspbian, Chrome OS, UberMix or other
> readily available and supported alternatives. Sugar will join APL and Cobol
> in computer history.
>
> Tony
>
>
> On 12/02/2016 07:16 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>
> There is a IAEP thread "Preparing for the 2017 SLOB Election" in early
> August that has more details about all this.
>
> First, I want to note that while an 'election committee' has been
> mentioned, Walter said in that earlier thread:
>
> I am of the opinion that SLOB does not have to approve individual
> membership in committees. SLOB responsibility vis-a-vis committees is to
> appoint a representative. So I don't think we need a motion.
>
>
> As Caryl and Seb have reiterated on this thread: while they both helped
> run the election last year, they both said a few months ago that they are
> unable to volunteer for this year.
>
> At that time I offered to volunteer, as did Samson; and I found a possible
> web app to run the election and suggested Samuel Cantero could set it up,
> and he graciously did set it up.
>
> However, by September, (a) the GSOC project to make a font editor activity
> wound up, and (b)  Sameer offered to lead the vision thing, and until that
> is done I am not confident about taking any other actions, and (c) I
> accepted an employment offer by Google and have had less free time since
> then compared to when I was working as a consultant, so I haven't done more
> of the things I said I would do. I wrote on August 5:
>
>
> So, I volunteer to do the following before the next SLOB meeting:
>
> - I will ask Sam C to set up a new sugar-announce en lists.sugarlabs.org mailing
> list with himself, myself, samson, caryl and seb as list admins.
>
> - I will complete the review of all accounts on the wiki to mark the ones
> that look like spammers
>
> - I will make a final 'all possible members' email list
>
> - I will draft the email that asks people to join the announce list and
> explains why I am asking them to do this, and a motion to approve the
> election email, and share it on the IAEP list for community review
>
> - I will ask SLOBs to post and second the motion
>
> Then in early September I can send the email, and prepare a report with
> the new list of members and similarly to before another draft email
> soliciting board applications for SLOB to review and approve in the October
> meeting.
>
> Then in early October I can send that email, perhaps also with the
> donation request, and then prepare a final email calling for votes that
> SLOB can review and approve in the November meeting.
>
> Then in early November the call for votes can go out, votes can come in,
> and in early December the results can be announced.
>
>
> I still think this process is a good one, but regretfully I am not going
> to be able to put much effort into this until January at the earliest.
>
> So, I suggest that Samson and anyone who wants to volunteer to run the
> election take a look at that web app with Sam C and see if it really will
> work for Sugar Labs in 2016.
>
> If not, http://civs.cs.cornell.edu was used last year and should be a
> suitable mechanism for people to cast votes.
>
> Finally, I think the very next step is for whoever volunteers to run the
> election to come up with a list of members emails to solicit votes from.
> (Where the discussions last trailed off was in discussing who should be on
> this 'final members list' - I think we agreed to cast a very wide net, and
> I made some progress reviewing wiki accounts and, defining the members list
> based on wiki + mailing list posters. I am happy to share that WIP and
> explain what I would do next with it, but it may be better for the person
> to start their own list.)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP en lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
------------ próxima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-sur/attachments/20161202/c85f81ad/attachment-0001.html>