<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="#954F72" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi,<br>
<br>
I would recommend considering the development of a separate GTK4 toolkit. This approach could offer a more straightforward transition to GTK4, allowing you to leverage its new features without being constrained by compatibility concerns with existing GTK3-based
components.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Best,<br>
Ahmed<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> James Cameron <quozl@laptop.org><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, March 29, 2024 1:14:59 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Ahmed Fatthi <AhmedFatthi1040@hotmail.com><br>
<b>Cc:</b> sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org <sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSoC 2024] Request for Proposal Review: Transition to GTK4 Exploration Project</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText">The GTK3 toolkit is in the sugar-toolkit-gtk3 repository.<br>
<br>
I would imagine a GTK4 toolkit may be required, or the gtk3 repository<br>
may be conditionally compiled and renamed. Which?<br>
<br>
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 11:52:47AM +0000, Ahmed Fatthi wrote:<br>
> Hello,<br>
> <br>
> I hope you're doing well. I've decided to switch my project focus from "Porting<br>
> 12 Activities to Flatpak" to "GTK4 Exploration." I believe this project aligns<br>
> better with my skills and interests.<br>
> <br>
> Could you please review my updated proposal for the GTK4 Exploration project?<br>
> Your feedback would be greatly appreciated.<br>
> <br>
> Thank you for your continued support.<br>
> <br>
> Best regards,<br>
> <br>
> Ahmed<br>
> <br>
<br>
<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Sugar-devel mailing list<br>
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org<br>
> <a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br>
<br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</body>
</html>