<div dir="ltr">Hello Thomas,<div><br></div><div>I am actually working on packaging sugar apps with flatpak, and publushing them in Flathub. See <a href="https://blogs.gnome.org/tchx84/2019/11/22/linux-app-summit-2019-and-sugar-learning-tools/" target="_blank">https://blogs.gnome.org/tchx84/2019/11/22/linux-app-summit-2019-and-sugar-learning-tools/</a></div><div><br></div><div>The work goes beyond just packaging, but also doing some porting so the experience is properly integrated into the desktop paradigm.</div><div><br></div><div>I still just getting started, but I am getting ready to have some GCI tasks as well. </div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 10:35 AM Thomas Gilliard <<a href="mailto:satellitgo@gmail.com">satellitgo@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><satellit> this is silverblue f32 1119 has Turtleblocks 220 etoys and <br>
labyrinth 0.6 as flatpacks<br>
<satellit> why cannot most of sugar apps be packaged as flatpacks? <br>
Google tasks? walterbender?<br>
<satellit> <a href="https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Fedora_32#Silverblue" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Fedora_32#Silverblue</a><br>
<satellit> using system 76 laptop with it installed<br>
<satellit> #flatpack #silverblue<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Sugar-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org" target="_blank">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br>
</blockquote></div>