<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Walter,</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">The XO version (OLPC OS) is apparently
capped at F18. There is also an apparent cap on the version of
WebKit. I wish I had time to try this but I doubt I will be able
to try it in the near term. This is something that could be done
by a GSOC candidate as part of getting on-board.</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Tony<br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/7/19 11:41 PM, Walter Bender
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CADf7C8vTTTh7w+0Lbiwt6t_Lti+sxHYKXjfOuhNSXj907pvVdA@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">I did make (needs to be updated) xo bundling of
Music Blocks in a Browse activity wrapper. The problem was, it
would not run the synth on older machines. (It works in my F29
environment.) If you can confirm that MB works in Browse in your
environment, I'll be inspired to update the bundle.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>regards.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-walter</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 4:52 PM
Tony Anderson <<a href="mailto:tony@olenepal.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">tony@olenepal.org</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Scratch
is heavily used in Rwanda. The users do not find the 1.4
version <br>
as a limitation.<br>
<br>
As far as I can see, Music Blocks was not developed as a Sugar
Activity. <br>
A worthwhile first step would be to see if it works in Gnome
on an XO. <br>
This is presumably something a candidate with access to an XO
can do to <br>
show interest and competence. This could provide insight into
whether it <br>
would be feasible or worthwhile to port Music Blocks to Sugar<br>
<br>
Tony<br>
<br>
<br>
On 4/5/19 5:59 AM, James Cameron wrote:<br>
> We have 17 draft or final proposals. Most have also been
published on<br>
> sugar-devel@, but not all. None have addressed the
Scratch related<br>
> ideas.<br>
><br>
> That's fine. It's up to the students what they want to
work on. We<br>
> gave them many ideas. If Scratch were so important, we
would have<br>
> given them less ideas.<br>
><br>
> I don't think there's anything terribly wrong with the
ideas that<br>
> mention Scratch. Port Sugarizer activities to Sugar has
the most<br>
> detailed description;<br>
><br>
> <a
href="https://github.com/sugarlabs/GSoC/blob/master/Ideas-2019.md#port-sugarizer-activities-to-sugar"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/sugarlabs/GSoC/blob/master/Ideas-2019.md#port-sugarizer-activities-to-sugar</a><br>
><br>
> I do think we are wrong to assume and hope that a student
will adopt<br>
> an idea. If I were a student, I'd note;<br>
><br>
> * it's not a new thing, but a port of an existing thing,<br>
><br>
> * the technical complexity, or challenge, especially the
work that<br>
> would be required in WebKit to support audio, (Browse,
#85),<br>
><br>
> * the history of little progress in the code that needs
to be<br>
> maintained,<br>
><br>
> * that few of the mentors have made any successful steps
toward the<br>
> goal, and;<br>
><br>
> * there's been more hot air (talk) than action (coding),<br>
><br>
> I don't think we should be complaining about what
students have failed<br>
> to propose. We should be encouraging instead.<br>
><br>
> So to any students out there thinking of a first, second,
or third<br>
> proposal, consider "Port Sugarizer activities to Sugar".
;-)<br>
><br>
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 12:22:48PM +0100, Chihurumnaya
Ibiam wrote:<br>
>> I'm happy to see the students bring in their own
ideas too, I'm saying these<br>
>> activity ideas are being neglected,<br>
>> as all proposals suggested so far have been pointing
towards creating something<br>
>> new, while that's great we also<br>
>> need to improve on what already exists.<br>
>> Although there wasn't a specified number of
activities to be created but I<br>
>> don't think creating just one activity would be<br>
>> great as proposals so far are only referring to
creating just one new activity,<br>
>> while the idea says a "new set of activities".<br>
>> For Scratch, there's also a mention in the "Port
sugarizer activities to Sugar"<br>
>> idea but so far I've not seen a proposal for that.<br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>><br>
>> Ibiam Chihurumnaya<br>
>> [1]<a href="mailto:ibiamchihurumnaya@gmail.com"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">ibiamchihurumnaya@gmail.com</a><br>
>><br>
>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 9:18 AM Rahul Bothra <[2]<a
href="mailto:rrbothra@gmail.com" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">rrbothra@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Thanks for the suggestion.<br>
>><br>
>> I disagree. I am happy to see the students
bringing in their own ideas for<br>
>> activities.<br>
>> FWIW, we have already mentioned the suggested
ideas, as well as the<br>
>> resources to understand user experience. I
would like to give students the<br>
>> freedom to decide what they want to work on<br>
>><br>
>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 5:55 AM Chihurumnaya
Ibiam <[3]<br>
>> <a href="mailto:ibiamchihurumnaya@gmail.com"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">ibiamchihurumnaya@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Hi Everyone,<br>
>><br>
>> I've looked at the proposals for [4]create a
new set of activities and<br>
>> none has addressed any of the activities
proposed in the idea, although<br>
>> the project idea encourages new ideas but I
think that we should<br>
>> clearly state the importance of the ones
suggested as they're very<br>
>> important.<br>
>> Scratch for one is very important as it's
currently widely used and<br>
>> having it in sugar would mean more users.<br>
>><br>
>> I think that the importance of these ideas
should be stated and they<br>
>> shouldn't be neglected as they have.<br>
>><br>
>> Issue [5]#63.<br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>> <br>
>> Ibiam Chihurumnaya<br>
>> [6]<a
href="mailto:ibiamchihurumnaya@gmail.com" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">ibiamchihurumnaya@gmail.com</a><br>
>> <br>
>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>> Sugar-devel mailing list<br>
>> [7]<a
href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
>> [8]<a
href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br>
>><br>
>> References:<br>
>><br>
>> [1] mailto:<a
href="mailto:ibiamchihurumnaya@gmail.com" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">ibiamchihurumnaya@gmail.com</a><br>
>> [2] mailto:<a href="mailto:rrbothra@gmail.com"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">rrbothra@gmail.com</a><br>
>> [3] mailto:<a
href="mailto:ibiamchihurumnaya@gmail.com" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">ibiamchihurumnaya@gmail.com</a><br>
>> [4] <a
href="https://github.com/sugarlabs/GSoC/blob/master/Ideas-2019.md#create-a-new-set-of-activities"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/sugarlabs/GSoC/blob/master/Ideas-2019.md#create-a-new-set-of-activities</a><br>
>> [5] <a
href="https://github.com/sugarlabs/GSoC/issues/63"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/sugarlabs/GSoC/issues/63</a><br>
>> [6] mailto:<a
href="mailto:ibiamchihurumnaya@gmail.com" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">ibiamchihurumnaya@gmail.com</a><br>
>> [7] mailto:<a
href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
>> [8] <a
href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Sugar-devel mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
>> <a
href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br>
><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Sugar-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><font><font>Walter Bender</font></font><br>
<font><font>Sugar Labs</font></font></div>
<div><font><a href="http://www.sugarlabs.org" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true"><font>http://www.sugarlabs.org</font></a></font><br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>