<div dir="ltr"><div>I must admit James that I have don't know for sure how performance could be measured and I have been trying to find proper way to measure it. One thing I know for sure however is that measurement units are supposed to be standardized and rarely change <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_performance">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_performance</a>. The problem either way would to turn whatever performance unit given into a unit of time given the size of the data set before starting the training process, and this is my point of research at the moment.</div> <div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 10:01, James Cameron <<a href="mailto:quozl@laptop.org">quozl@laptop.org</a>> wrote: </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Thanks. Are there standard measures of hardware performance you could use as estimates? Measurement units change over time. At the moment I'm most familiar with Geekbench multi-core processor scores. On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 09:09:53AM +0200, Ahmed ElSabbagh wrote: > As for hardware, I am not sure how strong should it be to run a training model > for Neural Network or any other classifier. > > As for internet access, the training can be done offline no problem, it can be > slow depending on the size of the data set they add, it could be a feature to > try predict or estimate the amount of time it will take them given a minimum > hardware specification, the problem however will be the lack of pictures to > use, so a minimum number of photos and categories can be provided offline at > any given time, with other pictures and categories available downloadable > whenever internet is available. > > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 02:41, James Cameron <[1]<a href="mailto:quozl@laptop.org" target="_blank">quozl@laptop.org</a>> wrote: > > Godo discussion, thanks. > > In addition to hardware limits, also try to avoid requiring internet > access. > > -- > James Cameron > [2]<a href="http://quozl.netrek.org/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://quozl.netrek.org/</a> > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > [3]<a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org" target="_blank">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a> > [4]<a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a> > > References: > > [1] mailto:<a href="mailto:quozl@laptop.org" target="_blank">quozl@laptop.org</a> > [2] <a href="http://quozl.netrek.org/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://quozl.netrek.org/</a> > [3] mailto:<a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org" target="_blank">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a> > [4] <a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a> -- James Cameron <a href="http://quozl.netrek.org/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://quozl.netrek.org/</a> _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list <a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org" target="_blank">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a> <a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a> </blockquote></div></div>