<div dir="auto"><div>I am willing to test. </div><div dir="auto"> </div><div dir="auto">I have Some running on my computer.</div><div dir="auto"> </div><div dir="auto"> </div><div dir="auto">Regards <div class="gmail_quote" dir="auto"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, Jan 9, 2019, 4:36 AM James Cameron <<a href="mailto:quozl@laptop.org">quozl@laptop.org</a> wrote: </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 01:12:05AM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > Hey James, > > Happy New Year! > > > > > > >> 1) gstreamer 1.0 support in Activies. The 0.10 series is well and > > > > > >> truly dead and unmaintained, but there's a couple of key Activities > > > > > >> that still depend on it. Clock and Record are the two big ones here. > > > > > >> Are there any plans to move them to gst1? > > > > > > > > > > > > They were moved. Check the release announcements and the tarball > > > > > > directories. > > > > > > > > > > > > <a href="http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/Clock/Clock-20.tar.bz2" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/Clock/Clock-20.tar.bz2</a> > > > > > > > > > > Ha, already have that, will review packaging and make sure it's all right. > > > > > > > > > > > <a href="http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/Record/Record-200.tar.bz2" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/Record/Record-200.tar.bz2</a> > > > > > > > > > > Awesome! This makes me happy, thanks! > > > > > > > > > > >> 2) GTK2 sugar-toolkit, again a number of Activities still haven't > > > > > >> moved to gtk3, any plans? > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. We have a contributor working on that now, so please make sure > > > > > > we know which ones Fedora think are still GTK+ 2. Time critical. > > > > > > > > > > > >> 3) eToys, we've not shipped this by default for some time, I plan on > > > > > >> retiring it and any of it's dependencies in Fedora 29. Good riddance > > > > > >> sugar-presence-service! > > > > > > > > > > > > I've no news on this one. Best to contact Etoys project. > > > > > > > > > > They stopped responding years ago, they never even got around to > > > > > removing the presence-server dep. I've retired it now. > > > > > > > > > > >> 4) This is the big one... python2. With python2 being EOL real soon > > > > > >> now is there any interest in moving to py3, I know there was some work > > > > > >> years ago to do some readiness here with the move to gtk3 but I don't > > > > > >> remember the details. Fedora is actively moving to python3 and has > > > > > >> been for some years, I think for at least 6 releases it's been > > > > > >> possible to run without py2 installed at all. Is this the nail in the > > > > > >> coffin for Sugar? > > > > > > > > > > > > Our port to Python 3 is going well. We have good working code in pull > > > > > > requests and branches, and plan to merge it once we have the critical > > > > > > components complete. Our plan is in the GitHub projects tab for the > > > > > > organisation. > > > > > > > > > > Awesome news! Is there a rough timeline for this? > > > > > > > > Following last year's release plan; a v0.113 around 9th September, and > > > > a v0.114 around 6th October. > > > > > > What's the status of the 0.113/114 releases? I'd like to start to > > > working on the python3 builds for Fedora 30 sooner rather than > > > later. > > > > Stalled on sugar-toolkit-gtk3 port from static to PyGObject > > introspection for Telepathy. > > > > There's still no Python 3 support for the static binding in the > > Telepathy project, though the binding has been ported to Python 3 by > > our developer Rahul. So porting to PyGObject seems like the right way > > to go. It is in progress. PRs #389 and #383. > > > > With only myself and Rahul looking at this, I'd guess another few > > months before a release with Python 3 support. I'll put it down for > > discussion at the weekly meeting. > > Just thought I'd do a check in to see how you're getting on with the > python3 port, just trying to do a bit of planning for the next few > months. No progress. Also no testers yet apart from Rahul. I'd give it another six months. > I updated all the various Activities to the latest versions the other > day, except I couldn't find the latest version of TurtleBlocks, on the > download site the latest is 216 and I couldn't find it in git. Thanks for noticing. Yes, same here. Guess Walter too busy; so I used the checklist; <a href="https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-docs/blob/master/src/contributing.md#checklist---maintainer" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-docs/blob/master/src/contributing.md#checklist---maintainer</a> Downloaded and confirmed the bundle matches fbc61222ba95aa1118976434d6951647fea8e13c. Added tag to GitHub repository. Uploaded source to; <a href="http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/TurtleArt/TurtleBlocks-218.tar.bz2" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/TurtleArt/TurtleBlocks-218.tar.bz2</a> That should get you going. Test it though, 'cause I've made three traceback fixes after v218 that aren't in it. > Peter -- James Cameron <a href="http://quozl.netrek.org/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://quozl.netrek.org/</a> _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list <a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a> <a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a> </blockquote></div></div></div>