<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Hi Martin,<br>
</p>
I would like to point out to you and the rest of the community that
initially this was a pull request. Gonzalo "unilaterally" shut down
the pull request calling it "nonsense". This arrogance prompted me
to use the privileges which I have gained in order to make a point,
that this is a grave issue that cannot be ignored any longer. And so
I went ahead and merged it.<br>
<br>
I have given my reasons for this transgression of development
process, which nobody has been able to counter. I must insist in
these uncomfortable questions: <i>Do downstream distributors,
downstream service providers, and OLPC competitors, have
permission to use this logo?</i><br>
<br>
Why don't you set the example and offer constructive alternatives
instead of making personal attacks?<br>
<br>
Talking of "unilateral" decisions, who made James Cameron our
release manager? Walter? Unilaterally?<br>
<br>
Just wondering. <br>
<br>
For the record I support James 100% and will continue to offer my
help in any way that I can even to his proprietary Ubuntu fork (that
OLPC distributes privately including unpublished Debian packaging
for many Sugar activities).<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Sebastian<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 15/09/17 13:04, Martin Abente wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAEBd0-dn=xqAZqOhOU5-uYE+Fp6GpLa5+tYx_P61TwhuqmDTLg@mail.gmail.com">
<div>Another unilateral action from Sebastian, and a unprecedented
new low.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
For what it's worth, I think I face stiff competition for that
title. <br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAEBd0-dn=xqAZqOhOU5-uYE+Fp6GpLa5+tYx_P61TwhuqmDTLg@mail.gmail.com">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This "release" cannot be taken seriously.</div>
</blockquote>
Trademark and Copyright law need to be taken seriously if we want to
reach more children.<br>
</body>
</html>